one does not accept then be proven because you simply believe is someone accepts in order to gain evidence they don't need evidence
that's not how you debate and as a "older" debater you should realise your own childish nature
so lets do this how the big boys do it.
I post evidence to support my claim in order to change your mind and you do the same, normally those with the better argument win so lets try that shall we
Originally posted by Genesis-SoldierAccept the stips, boy. Or else concede, boy.
one does not accept then be proven because you simply believe is someone accepts in order to gain evidence they don't need evidencethat's not how you debate and as a "older" debater you should realise your own childish nature
so lets do this how the big boys do it.
I post evidence to support my claim in order to change your mind and you do the same, normally those with the better argument win so lets try that shall we
Originally posted by RJ 2.0It was an open battle. Vaako won. He would also beat Riddick one on one but you can't argue with success. One shot was all Vaako needed.
Lawlz. If Riddick fought Vaako 1v1 he would buttrape Vaako. Vaako sucker punched Riddick while Riddick was fighting wave after wave of Necros.
I like Riddick, and hes been portrayed as a stronger, more capable character in each movie since Pitch Black, but overall Id say new Khan would take him a bit more than not. I dont see Riddick handling Spock as solidly as Khan did, let alone the multuple stun blasts afterwards that finally took down Khan.