Originally posted by The_Tempest
So, in other words, characters w/ feats are "superior" to characters w/o feats?
In regards to specific abilities, and without a significant power differential that would suggest that even without feats its apparent person A > person B.
In this case, when we have two similarly powerful individuals as Plagueis and Bane and one of them has demonstrated immense ability in one area while the other hasn't demonstrated anything in the same area, it's only natural to conclude an advantage to the one with demonstrated exceptional power in that area. And since Zannah was capable of pushing even one as exceptional in this area as Bane, its also a natural conclusion that Plagueis may not edge out a success. I'm sure that Plagueis' mental attributes are very impressive, but without any indication of him being at the top in this area, I'm not sure I see him surviving.
Although, "willpower" is more of a personality trait than a feat.
I reserve the right to retract the above statement at any point if I so desire though. However, historically I have mostly favored those with feats over similarly powerful adepts without them, as I'm sure you know.
Originally posted by Nephthys
In regards to specific abilities, and without a significant power differential that would suggest that even without feats its apparent person A > person B.In this case, when we have two similarly powerful individuals as Plagueis and Bane and one of them has demonstrated immense ability in one area while the other hasn't demonstrated anything in the same area, it's only natural to conclude an advantage to the one with demonstrated exceptional power in that area. And since Zannah was capable of pushing even one as exceptional in this area as Bane, its also a natural conclusion that Plagueis may not edge out a success. I'm sure that Plagueis' mental attributes are very impressive, but without any indication of him being at the top in this area, I'm not sure I see him surviving.
Although, "willpower" is more of a personality trait than a feat.
I reserve the right to retract the above statement at any point if I so desire though.
Ah, the inevitable "oh crap" reaction when one has fallen into one of my cunning traps.
So, yes or no? Do we assume a character with known feats is superior to one without or not?
Yes it is. I find Banes feats superior because they're actual feats that are actually relevant to these threads and actually represent his actual abilities. I largely completely ignore Plagueis' ritual just like I do every other ritual in regards to these threads. He might as well as influenced Lucas for all I care.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Yes it is. I find Banes feats superior because they're actual feats that are actually relevant to these threads and actually represent his actual abilities. I largely completely ignore Plagueis ritual just like I do every other ritual in regards to these threads.
So just to recap: Staving off Kaan's manipulations, ignoring pain for a decade, and resisting Zannah's "tentacles" is more impressive than tipping the cosmic, universal Force in favor of darkness as a display of willpower?