The Living Tribunal vs. The Fulcrum

Originally posted by Galan007
what are you trying to argue, exactly? that the events surrounding tiamut/fulcrum were retconned simply because tiamut was shown on earth in later comics? sorry, but that isn't a formal retcon by any stretch--that is simply a retroactive event. it happens all the time in comics. the aforementioned event being specifically referenced in later bioS only helps to concrete the notion that it is still regarded as canon.

your egotistical/smart-ass comments aside, i don't think you understand what i mean by 'formal retcon'. i think you're arguing just to argue(which is all you ever seem to do.)

So I decide to point out an obvious hole in your claim regarding the Fulcrum incident still being part of continuity, and suddenly I am a smartass who only argues to argue? Real mature, Galan. 🙄

Real f*cking mature.

Originally posted by Dampyre
That's not true. The Tribunal said that the Stranger could have been his fourth face but there's nothing there. Again, three faces and one head. It's pretty simple.

Sort of like Brahma from Hinduism, or the 4 headed lion in the Emblem of India.

Originally posted by Epicurus
How can it be a retroactive event when the bios explicitly make it clear that Tiamut accepted the Fulcrum's offer to become his companion and leave with him? Because if Tiamut left, then he should no longer be on Earth. Which directly contradicts him actually being there on Earth in 2 separate story arcs. Not just an empty husk either, the actual Celestial being there as confirmed through Sage's actions.

So I decide to point out an obvious hole in your claim regarding the Fulcrum incident still being part of continuity, and suddenly I am a smartass who only argues to argue? Real mature, Galan. 🙄

Real f*cking mature.

stay butthurt, though. 👆

Originally posted by Galan007
lol, just like i said: you obviously don't grasp my point at all. this post was a beautiful depiction of that. 👆

stay butthurt, though. 👆

This is an informal retcon then. Either ways, retcon is still a retcon.👆

I get your point Epicurus, but I wouldn't call that a retcon, just something that happens all the time in comics... even writers don't know what's happening.

Originally posted by Galan007
lol, just like i said: you obviously don't grasp my point at all. this post was [yet another] beautiful depiction of that. 👆

stay butthurt, though. 👆

#crymore

Originally posted by Galan007
👆

#crymore

Troll more.

LT

Originally posted by Epicurus

That's why it's invisible. Because Stranger embodies the concept of mystery, which is not visually visible.