Well the first game was compared to Diablo at the time, Also with these Sacred games the world is alot bigger like Elder Scrolls big
this was the map/world for the first game
http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080810102626/sacred-game/images/7/70/Fullmapzb5.jpg
Off course the most badass looking character is pre order only.ermm
YouTube video
Originally posted by Kazenji
That blows, A game that originally started off being similar to Diablo with a world as big as a Elder Scrolls game reduced to a arcade style game.
Upgrades are only available in the main menu after completin a mission.
So it kinda feels cheap.
Originally posted by -Pr-
...Why?I mean, if there's a reason, that's fine. I just never had a problem with what videos I've seen.
Oh and just for fun:
I hated Sacred 3. It is by far the disappointment of the year for me so far, and I'm not sure if anything can top it. I'm a huge fan of Sacred 2, and to see it butchered is really sad.
The shittiest thing is that even if you forget that it's a Sacred game, it's still not very good. It's a little better because those expectations for the open-world RPG with crazy level progression depth aren't there, but it still fails in fundamental ways... at least the PC version does.
It's kinda bad when one of the guys involved with the game takes to Steam to apologize to fans.
Originally posted by NemeBroOh and just for fun:
Is that it? I mean, what's the context behind said statements?