Mad Max: Fury Road (2015)

Started by playa125837 pages

Movie was ****ing amazing. Makes Furious 7 look like Paw Patrol.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
You didn't answer the question. Where did you read such idiotic 'reviews' whom you seem to trust in place of the 220+ positive ratings at RT who actually probably know a tad bit more about film?

I've read those reviews from everyday people on different forums I belong to. Whats your point? So I guess the 220+ reviews on RT all came from cinematic geniuses and everybody should follow their lead and consider their opinion as fact? Gotcha.

Maybe the movie is good, but it doesn't look interesting enough to me to go spend money at the theater on it. Glad you liked it.

Originally posted by playa1258
Movie was ****ing amazing. Makes Furious 7 look like Paw Patrol.

Furious 7 was pretty good and will be 2015 #1 at the BO, but I agree, MM action was superior.

I actually didn't like F7, so hopefully MM is better.

Originally posted by playa1258
Movie was ****ing amazing. Makes Furious 7 look like Paw Patrol.

Mad Max: Fury Road sequel title revealed.

http://collider.com/mad-max-fury-road-sequel-title-revealed/

Originally posted by playa1258
Movie was ****ing amazing. Makes Furious 7 look like Paw Patrol.

Originally posted by Golgo13
Mad Max: Fury Road sequel title revealed.

http://collider.com/mad-max-fury-road-sequel-title-revealed/

That shows signs of promise, as the previous 'Mad Max: Furiosa' seemed like it would have been Furiosa centric.

Originally posted by Golgo13
Fast and Furious is a shitty franchise anyways.

Did you even stay awake and actually watch those crappy films, Aurora.

Zzzzzzzzzz.

Originally posted by Robtard
Did you even stay awake and actually watch those crappy films, Aurora.
Yes. Sign of a bad film is falling asleep. Mindless action is your thing but too much action in Star Trek is a no no according to hypocritical Robbie.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes. Sign of a bad film is falling asleep. Mindless action is your thing but too much action in Star Trek is a no no according to hypocritical Robbie.

Look how I have you doing flips again:

You said MM:Fury road "wasn't awful" but it put you to sleep, while "shitty" films like Fast/Furious you stayed up for. 😂

[url=http://io9.com/mad-max-fury-road-is-an-astonishing-work-of-art-1704715858]This is a good article[url]

"We’ve been judging action scenes by too low a standard: Can you tell what’s going on? Is the camera too shaky, or too blurry, or is the CG so cheap that you’re just seeing smudges? Are there quick cuts that keep you from following the moves? Or a bewildering mixture of too-tight close-ups and too-far wide shots? That’s like judging a gymnastics meet by the number of gymnasts who show up with broken ankles.

Mad Max: Fury Road has action that’s easy to follow, but also incredibly overwhelming in the sheer insanity and complexity of what’s going on at any given moment."

Originally posted by tkitna
Was interested in seeing it, but I've read so many split opinions of it that i'll just wait for it to hit HBO.

Here's what I've been reading-

"Saw it today. Pretty good. Enjoyed it. "

"Awesome Action in 3D"

"I saw it today. I thought it was great as action-packed visual junk food"

"saw it. loved it. sinuses were so clogged I couldnt hear hardly any dialogue which is just the way I like it. 2 hours of mayhem and explosions. "

etc,,,,

And then there was -

"Just returned home from seeing it. It sucked"

"It was ok at best"

"Took the family to see it last night and it wasn't "Edward Scissorhands get up and walk out" bad, but more like "sit through the whole thing to see if they can keep upping the level of absurdity" bad."

"Meh.................. "

Originally posted by tkitna
I've read those reviews from everyday people on different forums I belong to. Whats your point? So I guess the 220+ reviews on RT all came from cinematic geniuses and everybody should follow their lead and consider their opinion as fact? Gotcha.

Maybe the movie is good, but it doesn't look interesting enough to me to go spend money at the theater on it. Glad you liked it.

Sounds like some eloquent fu#kholes whose opinions you value. Try this review. It's a little more articulate. If it doesn't look interesting to you, that's fine, but moronic reviews from people who probably worship Michael Bay (sadly that is probably the average movie-goer) shouldn't be your guiding torch. Believe what you want, but the results are in: this is an instant masterpiece of a film.

Originally posted by Golgo13
Mad Max: Fury Road sequel title revealed.

http://collider.com/mad-max-fury-road-sequel-title-revealed/

Sweet title. Mad Max: The Wasteland. Interesting article about the tough shoot. It did look brutal. But boy did it pay off... looks absolutely stunning and real.

I really liked the stronk wimmin.

Originally posted by Golgo13
Furious 7 was pretty good and will be 2015 #1 at the BO, but I agree, MM action was superior.

I believe that Avengers: Age Of Ultron will soon pass Furious 7, but the best film of the group is Fury Road.

Originally posted by Robtard
Look how I have you doing flips again:

You said MM:Fury road "wasn't awful" but it put you to sleep, while "shitty" films like Fast/Furious you stayed up for. 😂

Bad isn't awful. It wasn't very bad it was just bad. Understand words from now on, guy who hates the Nu Treks and misses the old shittier versions.

I also think less of the vast and furious. Pay attention, baboon.

Look at the flips you keep doing for me, your rage is palpable 🙂