Dooku vs ROTJ Luke and ANH Obi wan

Started by Arhael2 pages

To me it always seemed that Luke mastered saber combat much earlier comparing to his Force capabilities. Between ANH and ROTJ there is big enough years gap for Luke to master saber combat through practice with droids or whatever means. Hence, during saber duel with Vader Luke was described as his equal. Later he faced Lumya and defeated her with shoto. Decades later one would assume he would be able to stomp her, yet, he still felt like he needed shoto to be able to defeat her.

Force wise even 8 years post ANH Luke was easily Force handled by Gedzerion.

So while I do believe that Luke can give a lot of trouble to Dooku, when pared with Kenobi, he is still a fodder for Dooku's Force attacks.

Originally posted by ares834
Filoni's claims aren't canon (except perhaps when pertaining to his show). Especially when he voices it as a "notion".

Yeah but considering he talked to Lucas daily while creating Star Wars canon for a few years, I'd say his opinion is a pretty important one to consider. He may be wrong, but it's unlikely he's way off on his power scales.

Besides Lucas has already stated Luke was no match for Vader in ROTJ. That alone defeats yours and Darth Ant's claim.

Originally posted by ares834

Edit: Anyway, in the nuEU Vader is already stated to be more powerful than Anakin so I'm happy.

Where's this stated? That makes it even more impossible for ROTJ Luke to be a match for Vader.