Civilisation - Why did it begin in North Africa and the Middle East

Started by Mr Al Saif2 pages

Civilisation - Why did it begin in North Africa and the Middle East

Why did Middle Eastern Cultures build the first structures known to man as Dadudeman states Arabs, Kurds, Turks and Persians are inferior?

Gobekli Tepe
The Pyramids
and most other early structures, the most complicated known early maths and belief systems. As well as language, after Arabs are genetically inferior. The translation period in Bagdad led to the renaissance in Europe. Arabs understood the circulatory system and the world was round first. Arabs performed the first eye operations and even invented the toothbrush. Arabs brewed the first coffee, but according to Dadudeman are inferior.

Not another one of these. Just because civilization took hold in the fertile crescent first, doesn't mean Muslims are better then everyone else.

Khazakstan invented apple pie, but that doesn't mean Borat was American.

Ummmm the terms you are using are not accurate. The people you reference are millennia before those peoples. The people you know as the Turks are not the original group known as Turks, who were nomads that actually practiced a unique practice of specifically marrying outside of their tribe. There are a LOT of different groups of people who popped up all over the world at the same time as the Pyramids who build similar structures. The only reason that we reference these peoples in particular is because they are the earliest known foes of similarly ancient people that we have writings from. Asia, Southern Africa, North and South America have just as ancient people practicing just as complicated math and religion. If you are asking, why does humanity as a whole start just south of that area than that is a mystery we know little about outside of evolutionary conjectures of human adaptation to plains environments.

The premise of this thread is flawed. Arabs are a myth propagated by Zionist Nazis to justify spending so much of our tax dollars on super AIDS.

Re: Civilisation - Why did it begin in North Africa and the Middle East

Originally posted by Mr Al Saif
Why did Middle Eastern Cultures build the first structures known to man as Dadudeman states Arabs, Kurds, Turks and Persians are inferior?

Gobekli Tepe
The Pyramids
and most other early structures, the most complicated known early maths and belief systems. As well as language, after Arabs are genetically inferior. The translation period in Bagdad led to the renaissance in Europe. Arabs understood the circulatory system and the world was round first. Arabs performed the first eye operations and even invented the toothbrush. Arabs brewed the first coffee, but according to Dadudeman are inferior.

Whirly,

Dadudemon, not "man" as no one would ever mistake him for one.

Dadudemon didn't claim Arabs were "genetically inferior", he claimed Arabs are genetically more inclined to rage and flip out.

Things have to start somewhere, it doesn't mean they wouldn't have started somewhere else all the same. It's mere stadistics whose interpretation has no meaning and we shouldn't use them as arguments to carry our agendas.

Knowing what I just said, it would be intellectually dishonest.

Re: Re: Civilisation - Why did it begin in North Africa and the Middle East

Originally posted by Robtard
Dadudemon didn't claim Arabs were "genetically inferior", he claimed Arabs are genetically more inclined to rage and flip out.

If you would focus on history of Europe, you will understand that white people have been violent to enormous extent.

Civilisation began in modern day Kurdistan… the earliest signs of civilisation were found there. It then moved south towards the Mesopotamian Plain along the banks of the river Euphrates… The Sumerians, they predate the early Egyptians. It spread from there.

It is said that early man started in Africa, but civilisation started in Kurdistan. There is a difference between the two.

Originally posted by queeq
Civilisation began in modern day Kurdistan… the earliest signs of civilisation were found there. It then moved south towards the Mesopotamian Plain along the banks of the river Euphrates… The Sumerians, they predate the early Egyptians. It spread from there.

It is said that early man started in Africa, but civilisation started in Kurdistan. There is a difference between the two.

Actually Gobekli Tepe, on the Mesopotamian plain in modern day turkey, 35 miles north from Aleppo in Syria predates all other megalithic structures by 6000 years. It comes from just after the end of the last Ice Age no one knows who built it. A solid guess would be nomadic tribes with Kurdish/Arabic genes. Given it is on a hill and is probably the first temple on a hill many people from surrounding regions came to visit it. It was as old as the pyramids are now when the pyramids were built. This is fact. But as Dadudeman said people from this area are genetically inferior.... Fact! According to him. Correlations do not make facts.

Re: Re: Civilisation - Why did it begin in North Africa and the Middle East

Originally posted by Robtard
Whirly,

Dadudemon, not "man" as no one would ever mistake him for one.

Dadudemon didn't claim Arabs were "genetically inferior", he claimed Arabs are genetically more inclined to rage and flip out.

Getting a bit sick of this Whirly Bullshit.

So the people who are genetically most inclined to flip out are the ones who first worked together in large numbers? That makes a lot of sense.

Some religions attract extremists; some are created BY them.

Originally posted by queeq
Civilisation began in modern day Kurdistan… the earliest signs of civilisation were found there. It then moved south towards the Mesopotamian Plain along the banks of the river Euphrates… The Sumerians, they predate the early Egyptians. It spread from there.

It is said that early man started in Africa, but civilisation started in Kurdistan. There is a difference between the two.

I'm always confused by this. Why Kurdistan and not Kuwait? Kuwait has a nice little gulf, Kurdistan is ****ing sand.

Originally posted by It's xyz!
I'm always confused by this. Why Kurdistan and not Kuwait? Kuwait has a nice little gulf, Kurdistan is ****ing sand.

12,000 years ago when Gobekli Tepe was built, most people believe we had hunter gatherer socieities, clearly they were more than loosely linked to build something for a 1000 years over 16 Acres and then bury it. The whole area was more fertile then just after the end of the Ice age.

Originally posted by Mr Al Saif
12,000 years ago when Gobekli Tepe was built, most people believe we had hunter gatherer socieities, clearly they were more than loosely linked to build something for a 1000 years over 16 Acres and then bury it. The whole area was more fertile then just after the end of the Ice age.

Who cares when it's in Turkey and Turkey's not in the Middle East, which is the entire premise of your 'Middle Easterners are superior' angle?

Turkey's a fair bit in the Middle East though...

according to one book I was reading it all started in the Omo Valley in Ethiopia.

edit:
Kurdistan is an existant country at the moment?

Civilization started in the United States.

Prove me wrong.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Turkey's a fair bit in the Middle East though...

Google says: Turkey, officially the Republic of Turkey, is a contiguous transcontinental parliamentary republic, with its smaller part in Southeastern Europe and its larger part in Western Asia

Pretty much the people you call "arabic" and "Kurd" are a mix of some seriously immense number of peoples. The practice of the Indo-Europeans of nomadic migration was all over the place there. By the common era the Greeks had conquered all of that area and subjugated it to colonies that mixed further with the people there.