yeah, i agree. There are some things i enjoy about 4 but i will never go out of my way to watch it. I felt that 3 was almost as good as the first movie.
However, at this point it's apparent that this franchise has been nothing but a paycheck for everyone involved and i dont expect this one to be anything different.
Originally posted by Kazenji
Over at Joblo.com they did a thing for CAST THIS and it was for a young John McClaneseems they narrowed it down to 1. Jensen Ackles 2. Aaron Paul 3. Taron Egerton.
No no and NO. Just make a new action/adventure cop movie. if the script and action is good enough it won't matter if it has anything to do with die hard. Making a new action adventure movie with the John mcclane name involved without having John mcclane is because you're trying to make money off of namesake
Originally posted by Robtard
Jokes aside, doing a 6th film is a bad idea, rebooting and doing McClane's early years is idiotic.
Well guess what....that's what they're going for
currently looking for an actor for young John McClane
http://screenrant.com/die-hard-6-year-one-john-mcclane-cast/
Originally posted by Robtard
Jokes aside, doing a 6th film is a bad idea, rebooting and doing McClane's early years is idiotic.
I'd rather go with the bad idea of doing a 6th film than focusing on McClane's earlier years.
I mean the popularity of the 1st Die Hard was an average person (cop) being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
From under-dog to hero is what resonated most with the audience.
To portray his younger years as action-packed kills the uniqueness of the 1st film.
The Conjuring Duo to do some rewrites on the scripts
https://screenrant.com/die-hard-6-script-rewrite-chad-carey-hayes/