Ferguson Riots

Started by Surtur74 pages

Plus keep in mind OJ was wealthy and could afford the best lawyers.

BBC recently interviewed the rap duo Run the Jewels who were in Ferguson at the time that the grand jury declined to charge the cop. Killer Mike made the argument that the Ferguson Riots "worked" for Ferguson because after the riots there's actually been changes with the resignation of the police chief and the addition of a few new black city councilmen. But the most interesting bit of his argument was that our national identity begins with a riot of sorts (the Boston Tea Party).

The problem with that argument is these riots were not meant to enact change. Those people didn't care about Michael Brown, they cared about having what in their mind was now a valid excuse to steal and burn shit.

So I don't think Ferguson should be held up as an example of how to get changes done. People need to know this type of reaction is just not acceptable. You don't get to indulge in your criminal tendencies whenever a member of the black race is wronged by a cop.

Originally posted by Surtur
The problem with that argument is these riots were not meant to enact change. Those people didn't care about Michael Brown, they cared about having what in their mind was now a valid excuse to steal and burn shit.

This sounds like an over-generalization. Were you on the ground interviewing rioters to see what they hoped to accomplish?


So I don't think Ferguson should be held up as an example of how to get changes done. People need to know this type of reaction is just not acceptable. You don't get to indulge in your criminal tendencies whenever a member of the black race is wronged by a cop.

But it did accomplish change, and I'm not sure that change would have happened if there had only been peaceful protests. I'm not advocating riots as the answer to every social problem, but even Ghandi asserted that there were times when violence was needed, and many academics now agree that without more militant, sometimes violent rights crusaders such as Malcolm X, the more peaceful agents of change like Martin Luther King Jr would never have had the same successes. It's a good cop, bad cop scenario.

Where we the riots when OJ got off?

There were no comparable protests because what caused the Ferguson protests was not a factor in the OJ case.

Originally posted by Bardock42
There were no comparable protests because what caused the Ferguson protests was not a factor in the OJ case.

A black man away with murder, white people get over it and let justice happen.

A white cops shots a black man cause he was in fear for his life, they burn their own town down.

I don't agree with this summary. I believe it leaves out vital parts of the full picture of what happened. OV covered that as well, just a while ago.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't agree with this summary. I believe it leaves out vital parts of the full picture of what happened. OV covered that as well, just a while ago.

Wrong

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
A black man away with murder, white people get over it and let justice happen.

A white cops shots a black man cause he was in fear for his life, they burn their own town down.


White person killing black person and getting away with it has been a problem for centuries. Black person killing white person and getting away with it is a freak occurrence.

Police abuse of black people is also a constant problem.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
A black man away with murder, white people get over it and let justice happen.

A white cops shots a black man cause he was in fear for his life, they burn their own town down.

Not before ripping the stores off though. 👆

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
A black man away with murder, white people get over it and let justice happen.

A white cops shots a black man cause he was in fear for his life, they burn their own town down.

They're also ignoring the fact that Brown's death was 100% justified and wasn't murder. The death of the two white people OJ killed was undeniably murder. But that's libs for ya. They love to leave important details out to suit their own argument. 👆

Originally posted by Star428
They're also ignoring the fact that Brown's death was 100% justified and wasn't murder. The death of the two white people OJ killed was undeniably murder. But that's libs for ya. They love to leave important details out to suit their own argument. 👆

What does OJ Simpson have to do with anything?

EDIT - I see he was mentioned... but his circumstances were completely different. He's not the standard black and low income demographic.

Originally posted by Star428
They're also ignoring the fact that Brown's death was 100% justified and wasn't murder. The death of the two white people OJ killed was undeniably murder. But that's libs for ya. They love to leave important details out to suit their own argument. 👆
If you put everyone who disagrees with you on ignore, who the **** are you trying to talk to? This forum isn't your little circle jerk club.

Originally posted by NemeBro
If you put everyone who disagrees with you on ignore, who the **** are you trying to talk to? This forum isn't your little circle jerk club.

70% of the time he's replying to TI, his only friend. 30% of the time he's quoting his own posts. 😐

Originally posted by Omega Vision
70% of the time he's replying to TI, his only friend. 30% of the time he's quoting his own posts. 😐

LOL.

^See, he doesn't even talk until TI posts. Him and TI should just make their own forum, they don't need the rest of us.

Originally posted by NemeBro
If you put everyone who disagrees with you on ignore, who the **** are you trying to talk to? This forum isn't your little circle jerk club.
lmao
Originally posted by Omega Vision
70% of the time he's replying to TI, his only friend. 30% of the time he's quoting his own posts. 😐
LOL

Originally posted by Omega Vision
^See, he doesn't even talk until TI posts. Him and TI should just make their own forum, they don't need the rest of us.

Quit crying because he won't talk to you.