Originally posted by pym-ftwNo, it's more like saying Lex Luthor > Superman because he has Kryptonite on him at all times.
That saying Amon is weaker than someone else by removing 90% of his feats is idiotic. We really have no idea how powerful his more traditional waterbending was. To try and say he loses based on a forced lack of feats is not a fair to compare.It would be like me saying Leia > Luke in a gun fight by feats.
Bloodbending more or less beats anyone who isn't immune to it.
That said, consider that Mako could break free of it and hit Amon. If Ghazan did the same, I don't like Amon's chances of surviving a fist full of lava. Or a head-on combustion beam. Zaheer and Ming-Hua may be screwed though.
Originally posted by yungz22agreed but it certainly gives him a solid base.
Reading books isnt gonna make you surpass an airbending master
Originally posted by NemeBroMako can lightning bend with very minimal movement. I will concede that combustion could possibly be used without moving. Ghazan on the other hand needs fairly large movements to lava bend.
No, it's more like saying Lex Luthor > Superman because he has Kryptonite on him at all times.Bloodbending more or less beats anyone who isn't immune to it.
That said, consider that Mako could break free of it and hit Amon. If Ghazan did the same, I don't like Amon's chances of surviving a fist full of lava. Or a head-on combustion beam. Zaheer and Ming-Hua may be screwed though.