Originally posted by Time ImmemorialNot being a psychopath who's incapable of percieving the consequences of his actions is "being a pushover"?
So you both prefer a superhero who is a push over.Interesting.
No wonder the last 4 superman movies sucked.
Originally posted by AuraAngelGood choice. Nick was a total sociopath in that movie.
I for one think Vince Vaughn's character in Jurassic Park: The Lost World was morally backrupt beyond redemption but hey.In all seriousness probably Hannibal Lector. Dat Hopkins.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Not being a psychopath who's incapable of percieving the consequences of his actions is "being a pushover"? Good choice. Nick was a total sociopath in that movie.
Right and most superhero movies are not filled with psychopaths..they filled with Mother Teresa's like Hulk.
MoS said it all but I dout you watched the whole movie, but here is what he said.
Originally posted by Bardock42Manfighting through a city with completely reckless disregard for the collateral damage of his actions is pretty certifiably his fault.
Man of Steel was shit, but I don't really get how it is Superman's fault that Metropolis got ****ed up, what's the reasoning behind that?
Him casually hopping over a thrown gas tanker and allowing it to crash into the building behind him and engulf it in a fireball while he stares petulantly into the camera is a pretty good example. Tackling Faora into an Ihop with dozens of people in it is another.
In the entire fight with Zod, he didn't make a single attempt to draw the battle away from a population center. It'd be one thing if the movie showed Zod actively preventing him from doing so, but he didn't even try. He's a pretty shit hero in the movie, all things considered.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Manfighting through a city with completely reckless disregard for the collateral damage of his actions is pretty certifiably his fault.Him casually hopping over a thrown gas tanker and allowing it to crash into the building behind him and engulf it in a fireball while he stares petulantly into the camera is a pretty good example. Tackling Faora into an Ihop with dozens of people in it is another.
In the entire fight with Zod, he didn't make a single attempt to draw the battle away from a population center. It'd be one thing if the movie showed Zod actively preventing him from doing so, but he didn't even try. He's a pretty shit hero in the movie, all things considered.
He used his super-vision to see ahead and already knew in each and every scene you noted that no one would have ended up hurt or dead because of his actions.
Why he broke Zod's neck, cos MoS wouldn't allow a single human to die that was preventable on his watch after listening and watching his stupid dad die.
He punched Zod into outer space, that's moving the battle far from a populated area. He's really the ultimate hero. Prove me wrong
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Manfighting through a city with completely reckless disregard for the collateral damage of his actions is pretty certifiably his fault.Him casually hopping over a thrown gas tanker and allowing it to crash into the building behind him and engulf it in a fireball while he stares petulantly into the camera is a pretty good example. Tackling Faora into an Ihop with dozens of people in it is another.
In the entire fight with Zod, he didn't make a single attempt to draw the battle away from a population center. It'd be one thing if the movie showed Zod actively preventing him from doing so, but he didn't even try. He's a pretty shit hero in the movie, all things considered.
Oh you mean like the time he saved a bus full of kids, or the coast guard and oil rig workers, or the A-10 pilot, or stopping the world engine from destroying the planet, or him saving Louis numerous times.
Cry more about collateral damage, drive to ferguson and march against the looters then bro.