Originally posted by Insane Titan
Bwhahaha Proff shows the way with desperation and lack of context.No wonder Superman fans names are in the shit.
LOL. Says the Thanos fanboy who made the ignorant distasteful comment "Superman fanboys aren't phucking". Yeah, Thanos fans are soooo classy. 🙄
..and you have the nerve to say Superman fans names are in the shit. Seems like the pot is calling the kettle black.
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
They did a poll last month and Phildo came in third in the worst poster award for any forum past or present on the Internet. High honor considering MLP and beastiality posters imo.Congratulations are in order. 👆
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
H1 got first.Some guy who killed and skinned small animals (cats, dogs, etc), then had sex with them got second.
Tight race though.
Phuck you, i can't stop laughing.
Originally posted by LordofBrooklynyou mean the scans of a weakend Thanos, a clone and scans were he was putting on a show for death. You need to understand context.
The scans you mock are proof that Thanos is vulnerable to attacks far inferior to that of Doomsday, much less the HUNTER PREY incarnation.Pick one.
What did Thanos say about the "Warrior Madness" in relation to Thor's power?
I NEVER stated they tanked the attacks. What I did do is point out that characters a tier lower than Thanos weren't decimated by Thor regardless of his amp.
He commented on Thor drawing power from the gem.
You made out the did, fact remained they was in a far worse condition from the attacks Thanos was.
Originally posted by Star428you would have a point if I was posting duff scans and lowballing.
LOL. Says the Thanos fanboy who made the ignorant distasteful comment "Superman fanboys aren't phucking". Yeah, Thanos fans are soooo classy. 🙄..and you have the nerve to say Superman fans names are in the shit. Seems like the pot is calling the kettle black.
I voted for him stopping at round 2 and here is a little bit of ABC LOGIC:
Let's just assume for a moment that both Thanos and Darkseid are both translevel characters. Nothing more and nothing less.
They both have "arch-enemies" in Silver Surfer and Superman, who are high heralds with the arguable potential for more.
I would argue that Silver Surfer has the greater durability than Superman, with him planetary level explosions and continuing to fight, while such have affected Superman quite often. And overall it's not crazy to say that Silver Surfer is overall more powerful than Superman. Yet Superman still performs better against Darkseid than Silver Surfer does against Thanos.
Thanos gave the Silver Surfer insane beatdowns and he was never at the receiving end. Darkseid got beat by Superman in some of their exchanges.
I would argue that Thanos has the overall greater damage output than Darkseid judging by them attacking high heralds like Silver Surfer and Superman.
But at the same time he should be slower by Darkseid having microsecond reaction speed feats and Thanos ... well, not having any. I still favour Thanos due to his (in my opinion) greater versatility once you take away Darkseids Omega Beam, which I simply don't see working as it in theory should, because it has failed many times in the past against DC high heralds, who had some kind of a way to deal with it. I think at one point a Green Lantern even absorbed the energy of it in order to save himself, but I might be mis-remembering that instance.
However, in round 2 it's over for Thanos. I think that he would inflict more damage to Darkseid than vice versa, but he would have major problems tagging him and he would have to rely on his force fields and tech.
In round 2 he would be weakened and he would again have to face Darkseid and even the equally fast Doomsday, who in his HP version beat Darkseid down faster than I would expect Thanos to do it, so he might very well have a greater physical damage output than Thanos. HP Doomsday was also piercing high herald flesh like it was nothing, something I don't really see Thanos pulling off.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
exactly that proves my point. Unless you think it's legit the heroes do better and do more damage than the abstracts did.
Either bad writing
or
Thanos (CIS) didn't increase his durability when fighting the heroes but did so when he fought the abstracts.
or
the gems healed Thanos instantly and allowed him to counter the abstracts
Originally posted by h1a8how's it bad writing when the same writer wrote the whole story and knew the context.
Either bad writing
or
Thanos (CIS) didn't increase his durability when fighting the heroes but did so when he fought the abstracts.
or
the gems healed Thanos instantly and allowed him to counter the abstracts
So he increased everything except his durability,lol GTFO.
Have you even read the story.
Stop with the bullshit please.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
if I said wasn't true and not backed by on panel facts. Show the on panel facts to back your case and prove me wrong.I'll wait.
You're doing some major mental gymnastics to come to that conclusion. The simplest answer is Thanos was indeed hurt, as the dialogue does not support your claim.
Originally posted by Delta1938you mean the heroes dialogue that didn't know what Thanos was playing at, yeah they are sound judges lol.
You're doing some major mental gymnastics to come to that conclusion. The simplest answer is Thanos was indeed hurt, as the dialogue does not support your claim.
Still waiting on that proof