Originally posted by Robtardi don't believe you or anyone else who says they didn't look at the pics.
I have no problem looking at nudes if they're shared by the person, but stolen nudes, no thanks. It's an invasion of privacy.
also, you've never watched ANY amateur porn? Most of, if not 100% of those vids/pics were uploaded without the consent of one of the parties involved.
Originally posted by marwash22
i don't believe you or anyone else who says they didn't look at the pics.
You have problems with people being rational it seems? If you want to look at naked photos, there are plenty to see on the internet. Why look for those particular ones? Because the media brainwashed you to do it?
I wouldn't make any big moral ground around it either though awesr
It has nothing to do with being rational. A rational person knows he/she wasn't responsible for the hacking or subsequent leaking of the pics, and that since the pics are already out there, looking at them isn't going to hurt the "victim" any more than he or she already is.
The only people who haven't looked at the pics are the people who have absolutely no interest. The idea that someone who has an interest in seeing Jennifer Lawrence naked refraining from looking at the pics for moral reasons is bullshit.
This is one prime example of the many flaws of cloud storage.
You can try all the encryption algorithms you want, but once you upload a file in the internet, it's there forever.
Nothing is truly ever deleted in the web. Even an intermediate computer hacker can access cache files dating back to the very early years of the internet.
Originally posted by marwash22
i don't believe you or anyone else who says they didn't look at the pics.also, you've never watched ANY amateur porn? Most of, if not 100% of those vids/pics were uploaded without the consent of one of the parties involved.
I saw one pic of Lawrence, looked like it was a professional shot though, just showing one of her boobs.
I have watched lots of amateur porn but I don't just assume it's stolen, if some of it was stolen or shared against someone's wishes then that sucks, but I'm not to blame for it.
There's plenty of free porn/nudes that is shared willingly, so I don't need to specifically look at porn/nudes that I know are stolen. This is just me; if you want to look at Lawrence's pics, I don't necessarily thing you're an evil person in need of death.
I feel it has more to do with curiosity then anything. I mean shes in the public eye with a pretty big following and fans hear "hey shes naked" they wanna see it. I mean you hardly even hear about the other girls. The most famous are the ones in the spotlight so it makes since. Then of course there are some people who went to see JLaw but then checked out the rest while they were at it but didn't really know most of them or care about them.
Personally I don't feel any moral obligation to not look. I didn't hack it, I didn't post it, and Im not sharing it with people. Im not spreading so I don't feel bad for looking. Can't even blame it on the cloud because I feel most of the celebs didn't even know how it worked.
Originally posted by marwash22
The idea that someone who has an interest in seeing Jennifer Lawrence naked refraining from looking at the pics for moral reasons is bullshit.
Well, if those are your premises then yes, I wouldn't say rationality has anything to do with it. But hypocresy on morality is one of the founding values of every sexually repressed society.