Originally posted by Lestov16
It was a massive style-over-substance movie. I was enjoying it until after Iosef died, at which point it felt like the movie was just adding plot points to fill out the running time. Equalizer was far better IMO but John Wick was enjoyable for a popcorn flick.
I think both movies had the same amount of plot and character motivation. It might be possible to argue that Denzel's character was a bit more justified in doing what he did but neither protagonist had enough validation to do what they did. Usually, in a revenge flick I'm happy with as little exposition as I think these movies could have used just a bit more. I enjoyed both movies In Their entirety but the second half of both movies found themselves stuck in the mud. I think john wick was a bit better because it never tried to be anything more than a simple revenge movie plus it also had the better coreography