Do I employ the highest level of grammar on this website

Originally posted by Digi
The whole correct/incorrect thing was me screwing around. With the joke well over your head, I can't be bothered to care about what you do and don't understand.

It's your tone, though. It's what's so repugnant. Forget the nonsensical plans and whatever else. If you were the least bit empathetic, the rest would actually be palatable.

I'm sure if I had not taken this route, I would be able to empathize with others. For now, unfortunately, I can only empathize with myself.

You can call it me being about my shit.

Gah! I did it again. Forgive the abrasive language, apathy is a hell of a drug.

At least I'm moral, the immoral wolves of wall-street who have interests in Iranian Oil are the root of all evil. The root cause, and I mean that quite literally.

For all I know, the IRA vans have been driving around my house; collecting very private and personal digital information for their psyche-profile.

Anyway, thanks for the amusement.

Originally posted by Digi
Get back to me when you're Neo.

Originally posted by Oneness
You never hit the mark; not an inhuman, not a polymath (although close), not a genius, not the shortening of the way, but the very first mind with no pre-frontal cortex 'turned-on' to negate 'free-thinking'; and with the metabolism of Marvel's post-SSS Steve Rogers to boot (imagine the brain-power that such a metabolic-rate would afford). With the anti-senescence gene (dual-growth of nucleic strands) switched on because I've tricked my body into thinking it's 'fit for survival' in a purely primal setting, youth can be sustained far longer even given the extra wear-and-tear of an absolute metabolism. There's nothing inhuman about any of it, some people have the myostatin gene, few don't and their muscles develop without ample exercise. It's all in the nucleic acid.

As I said, I need no particular competitor. There's a uniquely superior aspect to the writing-styles of all of the greatest authors; whom are each "imminent" masters of each and every single language on earth, respectively, in those aspects.

Am I not to be omni-linguistically superior in every single one of these aspects?

I'm going to let that sink in.

Back in 2008: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=486655&highlight=myostatin+userid%3A73571

*NRA

Originally posted by Robtard

Back in 2008: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=486655&highlight=myostatin+userid%3A73571

Most of the mutations should be trimmed, most viably through nano-surgery.

Although if there's a natural biological trigger for said alteration, as Epicurus' thread would indicate, such dual-growth would be very controlled and any mutations would be insignificant to the overall sequence - the integrity of the DnA would remain untarnished. In fact, it'd probably be improved. Ipso facto; longevity.

Originally posted by Oneness
Most of the mutations should be trimmed, most viably through nano-surgery.

No, they should use the real science stuff called gene therapy.

Go google search that and tell me how much you like it.

Originally posted by Oneness
Opinions?

If not me, than who?

Breaking the rule of thumb, one cannot claim themselves as #1 in grammatical imminence relative to this forum's user-base.

Sincerely though, does no one notice the way in which my vocabulary has developed to the extreme? Am I not able to recognize and therefore supremely utilize the minutiae of the English language?

Keep in mind this is an individual who was leagues behind almost everyone in the subject of English until his discovery of message boards.

My intent is to become an anomaly in the business success system of the world. Intelligence is a good tool in that respect.

No.