Originally posted by h1a8
there you are again equating energy projection with blunt force. I already proved that they are not the same. Thanos tanking Odin's blasts doesn't contradict him always being affected by high herald level blunt force or below.Odin is significantly more powerful than PG Thor as he bust out of the force block instantly. But Thor affected Thanos greatly with blunt force hits where Odin not so much with his initial blasts.
Now I would accept that all the countless times that Thanos has been hit by blunt force from a high herald as PIS, but the problem is Thanos has NO SHOWINGS of even no selling a high herald hit. Superman has at least 1 showing of that.
Moron... Do you know what effecting greatly means? That would imply Thanos was near death or at the very least KO'd... NOTHING of the sort even came close to happening. those blows barely effected him not greatly effected him.
Further, I've been over this with you before, thanos has been KO'd via energy projection but I can't recall one instance in his entire history where he was KO'd via blunt force trauma. So if anything he's more durable to that considering his history clownshoes.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiThanos was bleeding in the face and head was getting rocked, thus he was greatly effected.
Moron... Do you know what effecting greatly means? That would imply Thanos was near death or at the very least KO'd... NOTHING of the sort even came close to happening. those blows barely effected him not greatly effected him.Further, I've been over this with you before, thanos has been KO'd via energy projection but I can't recall one instance in his entire history where he was KO'd via blunt force trauma. So if anything he's more durable to that considering his history clownshoes.
You are using faulty reasoning.
Having been koed once by energy projection and never by blunt force doesn't mean Thanos is more durable against blunt force. Looking at Thanos history, he has no sold several energy attacks and ZERO blunt force attacks from high herald beings. When Thanos gets hit by a high herald's energy attack he usually no sells it. But when he gets hit by that same being's blunt attack instead he is shown to be affected. This is his entire history of showings.
We can't compare energy blast to blunt force directly, but we can compare a characters energy blast to their blunt force power. For example, for most feats, Thor's average energy projection is beyond his average blunt force power. But when hitting Thanos it's the opposite. He is able to greatly affect Thanos with blunt force hits throughout his entire history, never no selling Thor. But Thanos has no sold Thor's energy projection before.
Originally posted by carver9
So without his OMNI attacks and Psionics, Superman or the people I've listed would stomp him? By the way, super strength of Superman's magnitude has damaged Thanos. Don't think there is a single poster on KMC minus yourself who thinks Superman can't harm Thanos.
Those posters would be wrong in my opinion then. Thor on warrior madness and the power gem only gives Thanos a bloody nose.
I'm really not quite sure why people think Superman can harm the guy. Either his durability is being vastly undersold and people are just ignoring things like the Odin feat or the Surfer feat or him surviving singularities..or they genuinely feel Superman hits SO hard that..those things do not compare to him. Which, would be crazy.
Or they feel for some reason Thanos has compartmentalized durability to the point he can survive a singularity..but a lone punch from Superman will for some reason mess him up. People seem to think New Universe Superman is akin to pre crisis Superman, but he is so far from him it is not even funny.
Ha, a bit of both i'd guess, considering the claims on both sides.
Go way back to page1 and you'll see where i specifically said the claims would get worse and worse...
Originally posted by riv6672
This thread will be another Namor/Panther prediction thread.
Who has the most vocal fanbase here willing to post more and more outrageous claims for multiple pages.Should be fun!
Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos was bleeding in the face and head was getting rocked, thus he was greatly effected.You are using faulty reasoning.
Having been koed once by energy projection and never by blunt force doesn't mean Thanos is more durable against blunt force. Looking at Thanos history, he has no sold several energy attacks and ZERO blunt force attacks from high herald beings. When Thanos gets hit by a high herald's energy attack he usually no sells it. But when he gets hit by that same being's blunt attack instead he is shown to be affected. This is his entire history of showings.
We can't compare energy blast to blunt force directly, but we can compare a characters energy blast to their blunt force power. For example, for most feats, Thor's average energy projection is beyond his average blunt force power. But when hitting Thanos it's the opposite. He is able to greatly affect Thanos with blunt force hits throughout his entire history, never no selling Thor. But Thanos has no sold Thor's energy projection before.
Do you know what the word greatly means? Thanos would have to be KO'd or near dead for him to be greatly affected. Nothing even came close to happening like that. The most you could say was he was mildly affected.
We don't get by your opinion we go by canon feats. By canon feats Thanos has never been KO'd by blunt force trauma. PERIOD, end of story. You feeling like those blows weren't as powerful as energy blasts is baseless and without merit i.e. your opinion is inadmissible. For example we have Magus with the IG... hitting Thanos.. Magus was shown one shot killing people when he hit them. Thanos wasn't KO'd. Surely you're not stupid enough to think Magus with the IG packs less of a punch than Sufer.. Thor... etc etc?
Originally posted by Surtur
When you still seemingly have people making claims like Hulk or Superman can f*ck Thanos up..I don't know if it has run its course. Or maybe claims like that are exactly WHY it has run its course?
But this thread isn't titled Superman though...so I don't know why he is even being discussed here.