Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
A combination of physical and psionic attacks.All the combatants are vulnerable to both.
As for the Avengers they win using a combination of physical magical tech and energy attacks anchored by solid teamwork.
This combatant is vulnerable to all.
Originally posted by riv6672
There you go, a theory. Isnt that better than asking a lame question?As for the Avengers they win using a combination of physical magical tech and energy attacks anchored by solid teamwork.
This combatant is vulnerable to all.
How would I know what Reflashh's argument for the Avengers was if I didn't ask the "Lame" Question?
Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Reflashh doesn't need to know [B]MY argument to provide HIS own rationale for an Avengers victory. [/B]
It wouldnt hurt.
You start a thread with a clear winner in mind, seems polite you tell those nice enough to answer why you think so.
YOU are asking THEM to justify an opinion YOU have a problem with without benefit of explaining why.
One might say thats...Super rude.
Originally posted by riv6672
It wouldnt hurt.
You start a thread with a clear winner in mind, seems polite you tell those nice enough to answer why you think so.
YOU are asking THEM to justify an opinion YOU have a problem with without benefit of explaining why.One might say thats...Super rude.
I'm glad you see it that way.. I thought I was the only one.
Seems like alot peeps here are making threads with a clear agenda in mind already. Like unbalanced threads with a clear cut winner in mind. Which makes for little room to debate or even comment if its already visible what way the thread starter is aiming for.
Originally posted by Supermex
I'm glad you see it that way.. I thought I was the only one.Seems like alot peeps here are making threads with a clear agenda in mind already. Like unbalanced threads with a clear cut winner in mind. Which makes for little room to debate or even comment if its already visible what way the thread starter is aiming for.
Basically.
If i post an opinion and get met with a "really? How would that happen? Your choice is obviously outclassed in every way" type response by the thread starter, it makes me not want to bother explaining myself, as he was just waiting to jump on someone to stroke his ego via what he sees as a stomp.
Originally posted by riv6672
It wouldnt hurt.
You start a thread with a clear winner in mind, seems polite you tell those nice enough to answer why you think so.
YOU are asking THEM to justify an opinion YOU have a problem with without benefit of explaining why.One might say thats...Super rude.
Whatever agenda you have has blinded you to fundamental reason.
1) REFLASHHH- I ASKED Reflashhh what HIS rationale for an Avengers victory was. WHEN, I REPEAT, WHEN, Reflashh gave his answer I would have responded.
How can I COUNTER an argument someone hasn't made yet?
2) The Avengers- Look at the voting. If The Avengers were so overmatched you wouldn't have the posts you see here.
Originally posted by Supermex
I'm glad you see it that way.. I thought I was the only one.Seems like alot peeps here are making threads with a clear agenda in mind already. Like unbalanced threads with a clear cut winner in mind. Which makes for little room to debate or even comment if its already visible what way the thread starter is aiming for.
I hope Namor DIES at the end of the current story arc!
😠