Originally posted by Nephthys
Malgus received an amp then beat her. After the amp he one-shot her.So in other words you just dismiss his best feats? Theres nothing inconsistent with Malgus' feats nor was there any exceptional circumstance in TOR that made him perform better. In Deceived he received a permanent amp through deepening his connection to the darkside, and then spent a decade or two preparing for his ascension. But even before that I don't consider Koon comparable to him.
I was just saying that it is considered inconsistent, but I'm not too convinced about this.
Regardless, just PUSHING them is not overwhelming, because even if an opponent is vastly above you, you can still push them (for example see Ventress and Nightsisters vs Dooku).
Originally posted by Nephthys
Do you not think that his performance against the Strike Team is evidence that he improved after Deceived?
Perhaps, but I doubt the improvement was so huge, and there's still the fact that the strike team should be far above Malgus.
Originally posted by Trocity
Yeah I don't agree with that inconsistent statement either. That's like dismissing Luke's high end feats because he also gets tagged by Lumiya. And Caedus isn't a top sith because Mara almost killed him.
Actually, both high-end and low-end feats should be dismissed when comparing characters. Feats that show what ther're normally capable of doing should be more important. Or at least that's how I personally try to judge characters.