So your argument is that something my grandma would forward to me in an email, and something whose veracity is nonexistent, is a good use of your cognitive abilities and limited time on this Earth?
But sure, whatever. Let's talk about your list. It's terrible. We can't even begin to decode its veracity, except for a few glaringly awful falsehoods, it's a limited sample size, makes no attempt to draw a similar list for any other political faction, thus limiting its usefulness in an empirical debate, and, again, isn't factual or researched on even a cursory level. I feel dumber for having read it, and have less hope for our future.
Am I doing this right?
Originally posted by Digi
So your argument is that something my grandma would forward to me in an email, and something whose veracity is nonexistent, is a good use of your cognitive abilities and limited time on this Earth?But sure, whatever. Let's talk about your list. It's terrible. We can't even begin to decode its veracity, except for a few glaringly awful falsehoods, it's a limited sample size, makes no attempt to draw a similar list for any other political faction, thus limiting its usefulness in an empirical debate, and, again, isn't factual or researched on even a cursory level. I feel dumber for having read it, and have less hope for our future.
Am I doing this right?
Yes. I agree its pretty wild list. Do you believe Sandy Hook actually happened? Because there is pretty much irrefutable proof that it did not happen.