Voldemort "Official" apology thread

Originally posted by Silent Master
You really need to learn how to type.

Originally posted by Estacado
This muddaphucka begs to differ....uhuh

So, quan views his inability to type as a victory.

That does explain a few things.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So, quan views his inability to type as a victory.

That does explain a few things.

Pointing out that you can't type doesn't mean I didn't understand what you were trying to say.

Back to the point, you really need to learn how to type.

Originally posted by StealthRanger
Don't know why people believe the Horcruxes are any sort of factor in vs debates since they're not useful in combat, like, at all

"MVF Characters battle to the death or knockout."

Horcruxes prevents Voldemort from getting knocked out, dying, or even BFR'd. Stealthranger, you suck my balls. You suck them clean.

Originally posted by Estacado
This muddaphucka begs to differ....uhuh

Guys...guys...guess what? Estacado gets it. Harry Potter defeated Voldemort because he destroyed his Horcruxes with magic and magical objects. Unless your MvF Threads give Volde's opponents these weapons, they aren't going to defeat him like Harry Potter.

All hail Avocado.

"A Horcrux is the word used for an object in which a person has concealed part of their soul... Well, you split your soul, you see, and hide part of it in an object outside the body. Then, even if one's body is attacked or destroyed, one cannot die, for part of the soul remains earthbound and undamaged."
- Horace Slughorn

YouTube video

The movies support this.

Voldemort's body can be destroyed. The soul lives on, but who cares? He couldn't regain his power for years afterward.

And he needed outside help to do it anyways. He can't regenerate either, or forcibly take over people like parasites, he doesn't exist in other dimensions and he's so far from indestructible it's not even worth contemplating. Horcruxes are useless to bring up

Just for the **** of it :noworries

I have to agree, at no point do the movies or books state that horcruxes prevent someone from being injured.

But the books do say that only Harry Potter can kill Voldemort, right?

Why does that matter, are you back to claiming that he is somehow immune to damage...unless its from Harry Potter?

What?

I'm just asking man, jeez. I always thought the Prophecy was a little wonky and didn't get all the fine points. I mean, the whole "neither can live while the other survives" stuff was strange

You just seem awfully invested in the idea that only Harry Potter can beat him.

I'd say I'm as invested in it as one should be when it comes to the hypothetical Internet arguments over fictional characters, sure

In that case, what proof do you have that Tom is immune to all non-HP inflicted damage?

Hey woah easy cowboy - I surrender.

Just asking if anybody knows. Pretty straightforward question. I mean, if my understanding is correct, only Harry Potter could kill Voldemort. But that stuff was all over the place. Because he kills Harry and then Harry is alive again? And then like, Harry can be killed later? Its confusing. That's the point of asking questions, brother.

Harry lived because Tom's AK killed the piece of his(Tom) soul that was attached to Harry

Alright, so what was the whole "Neither can live while the other survives" thing?

Neme's post addressed it well. Voldemort will "live" but not in a way that matters in a fight.