Originally posted by BentleyRiddle was never beaten in skill in a fair fight. Potter had circumstances and people helping him. Riddle annihilates him but the same cannot be said of McClane's opponents.
I wouldn't call you idiotic anyways. I don't think I have criticized you when you're actually outdebating someone. I tend to nitpick though.Well, we certainly agree that Harry is not on Voldemort's level and that Voldemort had better showings against more competent opponents (the same can be said about McClane, in a way). The quality of most of Riddle's opponents were all over the place, which is why arguing in the basis of chump enemies makes for a weird argument. That was my observation.
It was never meant to be an important element on how McClane fares against Voldemort, I haven't watched their movies near enough times to make the most informed argument there.