Originally posted by chilled monkey
No its impractical and dumbass.Firstly it's more dangerous to its wielder than an opponent (as ares834 put it real swords do not have knives for a cross guard)
Second, Jedi have always managed just fine without needing any kind of cross-guard so it is clearly not necessary.
Third, from a purely aesthetic approach, it just looks daft.
Aside from that though, I thought the trailer was okay.
Originally posted by Fated Xtasy
So..... the Inquisitor's dual blade>>>>>>a crossguard? Seriously?
Yes, let's compare a 7 year old's TV show directed by someone who doesn't even want to direct it, with a multi million dollar production, global film, directed by someone who's supposedly one of the best directors of our era....
Right.
Originally posted by Fated Xtasy
So..... the Inquisitor's dual blade>>>>>>a crossguard? Seriously?
I hate that one too.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Inquisitor's lightsaber is used to market young children, and it does.
To like a 7 year old, the spinning blades must be badass as ****.
Indeed and that is another reason I hate that thing. It was designed purely to sell toys and this is the same.
Like I've said before, this movie was clearly made purely to get as many merchandising deals as possible.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Inquisitor's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFZrzg62Zj0
Not sure what your point is.
Erm, I never put the "Inquisitor's" in front of it. 😬 You just kinda ruined the joke. Lame:
Originally posted by chilled monkey
No its impractical and dumbass.Firstly it's more dangerous to its wielder than an opponent (as ares834 put it real swords do not have knives for a cross guard)
Second, Jedi have always managed just fine without needing any kind of cross-guard so it is clearly not necessary.
Third, from a purely aesthetic approach, it just looks daft.
Aside from that though, I thought the trailer was okay.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFZrzg62Zj0
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Yes, it still looks dumb. Pasting some guy's face over Palpatine's really doesn't change that
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
[ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFZrzg62Zj0
Still not sure what this is supposed to mean.
Originally posted by chilled monkey
Yes, it still looks dumb. Pasting some guy's face over Palpatine's really doesn't change thatStill not sure what this is supposed to mean.
Originally posted by chilled monkey
some guy's face
Fools need to calm down ITT. The implications being made in here are lulzy.
>Waaaaah the wheel-droid looks silly
>R2-2D is a top-heavy trash-can on wheels that was completely helpless against stairs for five movies.
>waaaaah lightsaber cross-guard is impractical
>lightsaber combat
>practical
>not twirling glow-sticks around like batons at a rave
Kill yourselves, SWVF.
Originally posted by chilled monkey
I apologise. I truly had no idea whose face it was.Also, let's not get blasphemous. I honestly did not mean any offence and I am sorry if I have caused any.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Fools need to calm down ITT. The implications being made in here are lulzy.>Waaaaah the wheel-droid looks silly
>R2-2D is a top-heavy trash-can on wheels that was completely helpless against stairs for five movies.>waaaaah lightsaber cross-guard is impractical
>lightsaber combat
>practical
>not twirling glow-sticks around like batons at a raveKill yourselves, SWVF.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Fools need to calm down ITT. The implications being made in here are lulzy.>Waaaaah the wheel-droid looks silly
>R2-2D is a top-heavy trash-can on wheels that was completely helpless against stairs for five movies.
Good thing R2D2 doesn't look a soccer ball.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
>waaaaah lightsaber cross-guard is impractical
>lightsaber combat
>practical
>not twirling glow-sticks around like batons at a raveKill yourselves, SWVF.
Couldn't give a shit if it's practical. It looks dumb as hell though.