Originally posted by Bro SMASH
So you think you're Samuel L. Jackson?
I know I am.
Straight punch in the air.Did he do that to his opponent?
Don't know, but you're assuming it's a special technique rather than just a punch.
Based on what? The burden of proof is on you.
You're also assuming that a punch utilizing just the arm, with no hip movement involved like a normal punch, is going to be stronger than a proper punch. And that's just funny.
Got any proof though?
Where as Mr. Sandman's punches look no different from how he normally punches.
Actually, he wasn't wearing his gloves when he punched the building. 🙂
Obviously this means the way he punched Mac is completely differently.
It's the truth. The fact that you keep bringing up less impressive feats proves it.
It doesn't matter whether or not it's true. It's a logical fallacy because you're resorting to attacking my alleged motives as opposed to debating the point. Attack the argument, not the debater, dumbass. 🙂
Also:
Premise: NemeBro is bringing up less impressive feats.
Conclusion: NemeBro is biased for Tekken.
The premise doesn't support the conclusion at all.
doh That's not the point.
It is if I say it is boy.
The point is about whether it matters if a character is amped or not. Despite the differences in both Kazuya' T4 story and the canon story, he wasn't amped in either one. That just goes to show you that it doesn't matter.Paul wasn't amped in any of endings (as far as I know) but none of them was ever said to be canon so it doesn't matter.
It does. If a character is given an amp we know they never got, then the feat is useless for debating purposes.
Similarly, using Kazuya as an example, his defeat of Jin and Heihachi is not valid evidence because we know for a fact that Kazuya didn't beat them in T4 (feats against inanimate objects and shit exist in a murky grey area).
Paul? The endings don't contradict anything.
Tell me: why do you think the devs would show us him shattering boulders if he couldn't accomplish it?
There's no proof any of them can do it in far less time than Mr. Sandman.
Sure there is. I've proven that any of these characters can destroy more in a single punch than Mr. Sandman did.
And lol at Heihachi not being able to beat two characters with inferior feats but is somehow gonna solo the Punch-Out!! universe. 😂
Are you referring to Lars and Alisa?
They do have feats. They managed to put up a good fight against Heihachi. 🙂
Oh, and Alisa can fly, dodge missile, and be hit in the face by a helicopter with no injury.
Lars? Lol.
Easily put down gun-wielding opponents, cratered the solid floor of the Mishima Zaibatsu, and took a grenade to the face without injury.
Tell me more about how Mr. Sandman and Little Mac compare to characters who easily take on gun-wielding opponents and withstand explosions that would kill any Little Mac character.
Why do you think the concussive force of an explosion is different from that of a punch, by the way?
It doesn't matter what you posted, if it's not relevant, then it doesn't count.
Still can't prove it doesn't count binky boy.
All we can clearly see the destroyed wall in front of him.
Buildings have four walls.
There's no clear view what's that in the background.
There's clearly a big broken wall in the background. Put on your glasses.
Do you really think the wiring would be THAT big if it was behind him?
Don't know, don't care. Ask the artists.
And just another thing; he's not punching in the last frame, you can't prove that he moved when he was.
There's still dust in the air, but glad you conceded that he did, in fact, move in the third frame.
I can support the claim that he did, in fact, move while punching the building by pointing out you have nothing but your assumption that he stood still (because you really are trying to not lose this argument. A futile effort as I've already won). I can do this by pointing out the relatively minor damage done to the wall with his first punch, and even point out that in the second frame he would have to move to continue punching the building. Otherwise he would only hit air.
Sorry bro. Feat took an extended effort. He lacks the raw explosive one-punch power of a Tekken character. 👆
If you keep doing this whole grammar mess, then I'm just going to have to take it as a concession because it's not something worth bringing up and you know it.
First of all: style over substance fallacy.
Second of all, that's not what a concession is. I've addressed your every word in meticulous detail. While you have to shorten my posts to reply and straw man them because you're a coward.
You're making excuses now. He's either standing outside or not. You can't have it both ways.
No, I certainly can you dumb mother****er.
He's inside the remains of the building. On the horizontal plane he is surrounded by the debris. But on the vertical plane the sky is open to him, meaning from that point of view he is outside.
If you step inside a ring of trees, are you no longer outside?
We already know he's standing outside while there's no proof in any frame that he's standing inside, so what's been consistently shown in all of these frames is that, yes, he's outside. End of story.
No. 👇
We can clearly see the remains of the building behind him, as well as in front of him.
I never conceded.
This entire debate has been concession after concession on your part.
Truly I am invincible. The world's greatest.
Wei, I think our friend may need prescription glasses. Do you see the building wreakage behind Mr. Sandman?