Maleficent vs Voldemort

Started by StealthRanger4 pages

Word of God>

Also, the fact they're not bullet timers and don't have the durability to survive bullets, yeah

Originally posted by quanchi112
Based on absolutely nothing in the films.

Try watching the movies, Wizards got injured plenty of times by things that were less powerful than a bullet.

Originally posted by StealthRanger
Word of God>

Also, the fact they're not bullet timers and don't have the durability to survive bullets, yeah

Films only. We just upheld the rule. Her word only counts for the book versions.

😉

Originally posted by quanchi112
It does not burn him to touch him. It burned her when it touched her. Entirely different. Quit ignoring the context.

Voldemort doesn't carry Iron though.

Maleficent is vulnerable to iron, yes, but what does it matter?

If they have knowledge of each other, she can bolt upwards into the sky while casting a spell on Voldy. Also, M doesn't need a wand.

Originally posted by Werewolf582
Voldemort doesn't carry Iron though.
That isn't the point. Her magic still worked yet she struggled against a person with no powers. Laughable. Voldemort rapes her.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That isn't the point. Her magic still worked yet she struggled against a person with no powers. Laughable. Voldemort rapes her.
And a person with no powers can kill voldemort.

Simple as that.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That isn't the point. Her magic still worked yet she struggled against a person with no powers. Laughable. Voldemort rapes her.

Wrong. She was struggling against iron in a weakened state, and without her wings.

Everyone has weaknesses, but that's irrelevant here.

With wings and at full power, M destroys V.

If you disagree, cite specific examples, please.

Originally posted by Werewolf582
And a person with no powers can kill voldemort.

Simple as that.

Not in a fight with his powers in play.

Originally posted by Impediment
Wrong. She was struggling against iron in a weakened state, and without her wings.

Everyone has weaknesses, but that's irrelevant here.

With wings and at full power, M destroys V.

If you disagree, cite specific examples, please.

Ok, I will play the evidence game and do try to keep up.

With her wings at the beginning when the king comes to challenge the moors she has the moors come to her defense. In battle she flies, tackles, and physically clashes with fodder. She flies into the king and uses her wings to drive peoole back. That isn't impressive due to the fact Voldemort also has flight options and long range capabilities.

Iron does weaken her but with the iron all over her she clearly uses her magic to alter her friend into a dragon. Her magic clearly works. It just physically hurts her like I said.

King Stefan then hits her with his weapon knocking her down while his men keep her caged in. She gets her wings back and has to physically cut the dragon loose. That is weak and shows her reliance on being physical with her wings as opposed to long ranged magic.

She still tries to spare the king who did all this to her. She isn't merciless in any way, shape, or form and her abilities in combat rely far too heavily on being physical.

She has no defenses against Voldemort who can fly extremely fast and blast her while doing so in character. He's quite merciless unlike the weak Maleficent.

2:39 in.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IKkXED4M1PE

Now feel free to cite examples yourself and let's see what you have.

Mal can polymorph living things with a word. "You're a mealworm"

Originally posted by Robtard
Mal can polymorph living things with a word. "You're a mealworm"
Tha is three words whereas Voldemort can simply say, "Crucio." One word is far easier to say than three.

Voldemort has a stuttering problem. It would take too long to say..Cr..Cr..Cru..Crucio.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Tha is three words whereas Voldemort can simply say, "Crucio." One word is far easier to say than three.

She actually only has to name the animal/creature, "Mealworm". Two syllables are easier to say than three.

Welcome to the new "Lord" Voldemort:

Originally posted by Robtard
She actually only has to name the animal/creature, "Mealworm". Two syllables are easier to say than three.

Welcome to the new "Lord" Voldemort:

Wanna time out the length of time it takes to say the words used in the film here.

You also are ignoring how she fights Stefan and the other human king.

😂

Crucio is also easier to say. You also changed your claim from "you're a mealworm to mealworm."

Dance.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Wanna time out the length of time it takes to say the words used in the film here.

You also are ignoring how she fights Stefan and the other human king.

😂

Crucio is also easier to say. You also changed your claim from "you're a mealworm to mealworm."

Dance.

Watch the film, iirc, she just says "dragon" and the transformation happens.

Nothing's been ignored

Two syllables is one less than three. Math > you

Originally posted by Robtard
Watch the film, iirc, she just says "dragon" and the transformation happens.

Nothing's been ignored

Two syllables is one less than three. Math > you

That is her creature. When does she do so against an opponent ? Why didn't she morph Stefan into an animal ? You can't ignore their battles and make things up.

Maleficent did not transform any of the humans who opposed her. She relied on her physicality with her wings attached.

🙂

Context.

The hilarious thing is if I pitted her against Gandalf you'd abandon this horrific logic showing a clear double standard.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Films only. We just upheld the rule. Her word only counts for the book versions.

😉

are you making the claim that Harry Potter characters are bullet proof?

Originally posted by marwash22
are you making the claim that Harry Potter characters are bullet proof?
When did I say that ??

Originally posted by StealthRanger
Humans with guns>wizards
Originally posted by quanchi112
Based on absolutely nothing in the films.

are you disputing the idea that a person with a gun could kill a harry potter wizard?