Originally posted by quanchi112
I **** him in the ass every time he tries to debate with me.
You forgot I've seen your hands in that pic posted in the MVF social, quan-buddy. They're tiny. You have tiny hands. Tiny hands; this is a fact. Condolences?
I expect a "no you!" reply in another thread soon, thanks, Tiny-Hands.
Originally posted by Robtard
I did screenshots awhile back, the only time the Kyprtonian helms were damaged was when the armor was down (in Zod's case) and partially down (in Faora's case). Nam-ek was smart enough to keep his fully armored when he fought.
yes and I'm not arguing against that. But to think that they're indestructible just because it's armored up is silly. Tougher maybe, but since Superman never really unloaded on Namek's face like he did Zod we can't assume that the armored look can withstand Superman's punches for long.
The only thing we know for sure is that it looks different.
Originally posted by FrothByte
yes and I'm not arguing against that. But to think that they're indestructible just because it's armored up is silly. Tougher maybe, but since Superman never really unloaded on Namek's face like he did Zod we can't assume that the armored look can withstand Superman's punches for long.The only thing we know for sure is that it looks different.
I don't think anyone argued "indestructible", but Kryptonian gear is extremely durable. When Superman was going all-out of armored-Zod, the armor withstood.
It doesn't take a lot of outside-the-box thinking to realize that a solid metal looking bit of war-gear would logically be more durable than a thin, transparent malleable piece. Though to the helm's credit, even when not fully armored, the clear face-mask can still take a lot of punishment before failing. iirc, Superman punched Zod in the face 7-8 times before Zod's broke.
Originally posted by FrothByte
yes and I'm not arguing against that. But to think that they're indestructible just because it's armored up is silly. Tougher maybe, but since Superman never really unloaded on Namek's face like he did Zod we can't assume that the armored look can withstand Superman's punches for long.The only thing we know for sure is that it looks different.
Nam never took his armor down. Faora and Zod did. Hence them being weakened. He did not make that mistake.
Originally posted by Robtard
I don't think anyone argued "indestructible", but Kryptonian gear is extremely durable. When Superman was going all-out of armored-Zod, the armor withstood.It doesn't take a lot of outside-the-box thinking to realize that a solid metal looking bit of war-gear would logically be more durable than a thin, transparent malleable piece. Though to the helm's credit, even when not fully armored, the clear face-mask can still take a lot of punishment before failing. iirc, Superman punched Zod in the face 7-8 times before Zod's broke.
Agreed
Originally posted by Robtard
I don't think anyone argued "indestructible", but Kryptonian gear is extremely durable. When Superman was going all-out of armored-Zod, the armor withstood.It doesn't take a lot of outside-the-box thinking to realize that a solid metal looking bit of war-gear would logically be more durable than a thin, transparent malleable piece. Though to the helm's credit, even when not fully armored, the clear face-mask can still take a lot of punishment before failing. iirc, Superman punched Zod in the face 7-8 times before Zod's broke.
I guess it boils down to whether you believe Thor and Hulk have enough force to break the mask. I believe they do, though it definitely won't be easy. Still, if they do break it then Namek is ph*cked.
Zod on the other hand... I don't see how they can take him out.
Originally posted by FrothByte
I guess it boils down to whether you believe Thor and Hulk have enough force to break the mask. I believe they do, though it definitely won't be easy. Still, if they do break it then Namek is ph*cked.Zod on the other hand... I don't see how they can take him out.
Agreed. I do think that either could damage the helm with enough hits, just hard to say how many since we know the transparent face-mask is very durable as is and Nam-ek isn't going to lower his armor.
Agreed.
Originally posted by Robtard
Agreed. I do think that either could damage the helm with enough hits, just hard to say how many since we know the transparent face-mask is very durable as is and Nam-ek isn't going to lower his armor.Agreed.
I guess one thing I consider as an advantage for Thor and Hulk is striking power. The kryptonians are faster, more durable and overall stronger... but I don't recall the krptonians having any striking feats to match the leviathan punch or Jotunheim buster. This is why I think Thor and Hulk have a chance at busting that helmet, but like you said it will need to be multiple hits.
In the end, I think we all agree the kryptonians win anyway.
Originally posted by carver9YouTube video
When did he display super speed?
Fifty seconds in, Name-Ek hops into the fray in a blur and catches Superman mid-flight.
At 1:18 he jumps forward and creates a sonic boom.
He's not as fast as Faora, Zod, or Superman, but he still has Kryptonian super speed. These feats and the ability to fight Superman put his speed above Hulk and Thor's.