Humhum if the bad guy iz Palpatine, or Vitiate there iz no redemption, if the bad guy iz mandalore, you muzt give him a warrior death.... Etc etc etc etc etc....
If the bad guy iz boba fett, or Jango, yo rather run don't try to make négociation !!!
The Jedi iz alwayz, there iz alwayz redemption come on !
And then every body rezpond are you mad????
Originally posted by Tzeentch
I dunno. That strikes me as equivalent to saying that it wasn't kicking Japan's ass across the pacific and then nuking them that made the Japanese surrender, the "solution" derived from them not wanting to fight anymore.The violence and killing of their ideological leaders was the catalyst for the Vong's change. They would never have done so if the war had gone better for them, imo.
If we take it that way, practically any war is disqualified no matter how it ends.
Unlike Japan, they were still in possession of a large and powerful fleet and had options. Japan lost and surrendered. The Vong were not doing well but had not lost.
Japan surrendered after losing a fight. The Vong made peace while they could fight.
Originally posted by Q99Well, yeah. lol
If we take it that way, practically any war is disqualified no matter how it ends.
They should be disqualified. Incidences that result in the death of billions (trillions?) shouldn't be classified as incidents that are solved without violence. imo
And Japan and the Vong aren't so different. Japan could still fight when they surrendered- in fact it was estimated that trying to take Japan in a conventional military operation would have been one of the costliest (in US lives) battles in the war. Japan surrendered because it had suffered a string of crippling defeats and because the people had grown disillusioned with the Emperor and were tired of fighting for the cause, which is pretty analogous with the Vong.