FORM V fight

Started by carthage2 pages

FORM V fight

*Battle takes place on neutral ground

TCW Anakin Skywalker vs. Kyle Katarn vs. Ulic Qel Droma vs. Plo Koon vs. ROTJ Vader vs. ROTJ Luke vs. Darth Malgus

Vader, then Droma, then Luke.

Bane.

That's not even an option.

Bane is Mortis tier.

Luke = Vader > TCW Anakin > Ulic Qel-Droma > Plo Koon =/> Kyle Katarn

I didn't include Bane because he isn't a skilled duelist. The guys listed are among the best in the style.

I think Malgus could be included.

You're probably right.

I think he could take Katarn, a pure duel between him and Plo could go either way.

I think Malgus could take Plo, if not because of superior physicals but because Plo would inevitably eat kicks from him all day.

Which was pretty much how Savage took him out. I haven't seen the TCW series in its entirety, but is there anything suggesting he could take Vader in a pure saber duel?

Personally I don't think any of the PT council (excluding obi-wan, anakin, yoda + mace obviously) can take one of the great Sith Lords (who actually duel) in a saber fight. Malak, Malgus, Wrath, Ulic blah blah etc should be above them, even if a few maybe aren't solidly so.

Originally posted by ILS
Bane is Mortis tier.

Luke = Vader > TCW Anakin > Ulic Qel-Droma > Plo Koon =/> Kyle Katarn

Kyle's stance seems to be slipping lately

Originally posted by Nephthys
Personally I don't think any of the PT council (excluding obi-wan, anakin, yoda + mace obviously) can take one of the great Sith Lords (who actually duel) in a saber fight. Malak, Malgus, Wrath, Ulic blah blah etc should be above them, even if a few maybe aren't solidly so.
Why?

Because they don't stack up in power or ability.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Because they don't stack up in power or ability.
Okay, well.. why wouldn't Plo Koon for example be able to defeat Darth Malak in a lightsaber duel?

Because Malak's better and more powerful than him? I mean, isn't Koon's best feat not dying against GG?

Originally posted by Nephthys
Because Malak's better and more powerful than him? I mean, isn't Koon's best feat not dying against GG?
Based on what? And Koon hasn't even fought Grievous. His best feats are fighting evenly with Savage, and contending with Ventress with a broken arm. What does Malak have to exceed that?

Koon never fought Grievous, but he did stalemate Ventress.

Originally posted by ILS
Based on what? And Koon hasn't even fought Grievous. His best feats are fighting evenly with Savage, and contending with Ventress with a broken arm. What does Malak have to exceed that?

Being the greatest Sith alive in his Empire? Ask Ant if you want feats, he's got them all. I simply do not think that someone like Plo Koon could beat Malak.

Also Koon lost to Savage.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Koon never fought Grievous, but he did stalemate Ventress.

Oh yeah, I was thinking of Mundi.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Being the greatest Sith alive in his Empire? Ask Ant if you want feats, he's got them all. I simply do not think that someone like Plo Koon could beat Malak.

Also Koon lost to Savage.

How exactly does that accolade correlate to being > Koon in a lightsaber duel? You're free to believe what you want, I just don't understand your reasoning.

Good for Savage, I guess? And he lost due to having his mask ripped off, not through a dueling disparity.