Originally posted by NephthysWhy?
Personally I don't think any of the PT council (excluding obi-wan, anakin, yoda + mace obviously) can take one of the great Sith Lords (who actually duel) in a saber fight. Malak, Malgus, Wrath, Ulic blah blah etc should be above them, even if a few maybe aren't solidly so.
Originally posted by NephthysBased on what? And Koon hasn't even fought Grievous. His best feats are fighting evenly with Savage, and contending with Ventress with a broken arm. What does Malak have to exceed that?
Because Malak's better and more powerful than him? I mean, isn't Koon's best feat not dying against GG?
Originally posted by ILS
Based on what? And Koon hasn't even fought Grievous. His best feats are fighting evenly with Savage, and contending with Ventress with a broken arm. What does Malak have to exceed that?
Being the greatest Sith alive in his Empire? Ask Ant if you want feats, he's got them all. I simply do not think that someone like Plo Koon could beat Malak.
Also Koon lost to Savage.
Originally posted by NewGuy01
Koon never fought Grievous, but he did stalemate Ventress.
Oh yeah, I was thinking of Mundi.
Originally posted by NephthysHow exactly does that accolade correlate to being > Koon in a lightsaber duel? You're free to believe what you want, I just don't understand your reasoning.
Being the greatest Sith alive in his Empire? Ask Ant if you want feats, he's got them all. I simply do not think that someone like Plo Koon could beat Malak.Also Koon lost to Savage.
Good for Savage, I guess? And he lost due to having his mask ripped off, not through a dueling disparity.