Indiana Pratt?

Started by Kazenji2 pages

At least he won't have Lucas sticking his noise in things.

You never know...

Nooice.

indiana pratt wouldn't be the worst to come out thou

Just because he kinda looks like a young Harrison Ford, doesn't mean he has the personality for an engaging Indy.

he has done well enough to show seriousness and a bit of sexyness in jurassic world

Originally posted by queeq
Just because he kinda looks like a young Harrison Ford, doesn't mean he has the personality for an engaging Indy.

That was my point when i made the thread.
The choice didnt excite me.
Still, the above is a nice piece of artwork.

Steven Spielberg won't allow anyone but Harrison Ford to be Indiana Jones

http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/steven-spielberg-wont-allow-anyone-but-harrison-ford-to-be-indiana-jones-225

He's got every right to do that i suppose.
At his age, with his wealth, i'm thinking maybe he doesnt care about rebooting the franchise and making it viable for another 10-15 years.

In honor of those not getting the part, today my sig is of the best possible casting choice they could have gone with: Patton Oswalt.

In that link he compares it to Batman or Spider-Man changing the actor, Shouldn't be done in Indy's case

but what about James Bond??....that's worked out.

Its obviously not what he wants for the character though.
One difference between Indy and Bond/Spidey/Bats...they all started out in print.
Indy is basically an original concept that was brought to life by Ford.

Thought of another example, the character of Mad Max.

What about him?

He never existed on page like Bond/Spidey/Bats, Started off with Mel Gibson playing him and they switched him to Tom Hardy.

Does it really matter what spielberg says??? Disney owns the right don't they...they can just get chris pratt or someone else and get a new director/writer???

Originally posted by Kazenji
He never existed on page like Bond/Spidey/Bats, Started off with Mel Gibson playing him and they switched him to Tom Hardy.

True, but that character has nothing to do with Spielberg.
I was just putting a possible "why" as to Spielberg being adamant on no new Indy.

It basically comes down to this: if they want Spielberg to direct, he's gonna want to have Ford.

Uh huh.