Originally posted by leonidas
i'd still take thor. it took loki with the hammer to overpower thor.... i think he's still pretty damn close to his old self in terms of overall power. just lacking some versatility is all.
Didn't the thing with Loki not actually happen though? Wasn't it's dream, or illusion or something?
Originally posted by carver9
Disagree. If Loki (with the hammer of course) can withstand it, I see no problem with Red Hulk withstanding it.
It wouldn't be the same as Rulk tanking the same thing. If you reread it you'll realize what the author was trying to convey.
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Hehehe.. The reason he withstood it was because he briefly held "the power of Thor".It wouldn't be the same as Rulk tanking the same thing. If you reread it you'll realize what the author was trying to convey.
Lightning has hurt Thor before though. Don't think that had a thing to do with it and even though Angrir defeated Red Hulk, Hulk was still handling his attacks ok. When it comes to energy attacks, he does just fine. He was ok when Namor blasted him with the Phoenix Force and was ok when Emma with half of the force did the same.