Originally posted by Sin I AM
I asked you was it of thor because the costume he's wearing is reminiscent of OF thor. All u had to say was no. But u get all riled up with your normal shenanigans and at this stage it's annoying. So please stop derailing your own thread and continue
Are you adding in posts that don't exist?
I told you it wasn't OF Thor.
Your response, was to call me a douche for posting the wrong pic.
FIN.
Originally posted by Sin I AM
Only after the blond whore comment which showed your true colors in relation to the thread
Stop lying to yourself.
You don't like correction.
Period.
You have a habit of making statements/arguments that are patently false. When someone calls you out on it, you then double down, which results in your being humbled. To add to the folly you then dimiss the proof and accuse the other person of missing the point.
A quick review of the threads you're involved in on the first page of the forum proves this.
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Could go either way, but slight edge to Thor. I'm sure he has the better h2h feats.
Majestic has more then a slight strength advantage over Thor, so why you would give Thor a slight edge confuses me.
Also, why are you sure Thor has better h2h feats? Based off what feat? It can't just be the mere fact Thor has been a warrior for a long time. That tells us nothing specific. Plus it's moot, Maj has the whole "been a warrior for a long time" thing as well.
Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
With speed equalized, I'd say slight edge to Thor. Both have planetary strength/striking feats, but Thor has a little better durability and damage soak.
I'm curious as to when Thor, without his hammer, was shown destroying a planet? On top of that, you also claimed Thor has better durability. What things do you feel Thor has survived that Majestic could not?
Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Stop lying to yourself.You don't like correction.
Period.
You have a habit of making statements/arguments that are patently false. When someone calls you out on it, you then double down, which results in your being humbled. To add to the folly you then dimiss the proof and accuse the other person of missing the point.
A quick review of the threads you're involved in on the first page of the forum proves this.
Lol so u didn't say blond whore?
Originally posted by Surtur
Majestic has more then a slight strength advantage over Thor, so why you would give Thor a slight edge confuses me.Also, why are you sure Thor has better h2h feats? Based off what feat? It can't just be the mere fact Thor has been a warrior for a long time. That tells us nothing specific. Plus it's moot, Maj has the whole "been a warrior for a long time" thing as well.
I'll be the first to say I'm no Majestros expert, but I'm going by Mr. Galactus's Majestic respect thread. An excellent thread if I may add.
Originally posted by Surtur
Majestic has more then a slight strength advantage over Thor, so why you would give Thor a slight edge confuses me.Also, why are you sure Thor has better h2h feats? Based off what feat? It can't just be the mere fact Thor has been a warrior for a long time. That tells us nothing specific. Plus it's moot, Maj has the whole "been a warrior for a long time" thing as well.
I'm curious as to when Thor, without his hammer, was shown destroying a planet? On top of that, you also claimed Thor has better durability. What things do you feel Thor has survived that Majestic could not?
Agreed. Majestic has been around for a very long time just like Thor, but one of these guys smells like new car, while the other doesn't. Thor actually has the feats to back it up. Majestic, not so much.
Originally posted by Golgo13
Strength-Majestic
Speed- Majestic
HTH- Majestic
Durability- Thor
Intelligence- Majestic
Versatility- ThorVery close, but Majestc takes a small majority.
It's H2H with equalized speed. Even if it was standard and no handicap given, Thor still has a victory over a character that would destroy Majestic. Glory.