Originally posted by Jmanghan
Steven Seagal, Samo Hung, Van Damme. All these people would easily stop Obama with a golf club effortlessly. Martial Arts doesn't care what weapon you're using
A) They're all actors
B) Two of them are over 60 and out of shape
I'd say Van Damme might be able to take a golf club wielding Obama since he's still in decent shape and would likely be too high on coke to feel the hits
Originally posted by Robtardlol
A) They're all actors
B) Two of them are over 60 and out of shapeI'd say Van Damme might be able to take a golf club wielding Obama since he's still in decent shape and would likely be too high on coke to feel the hits
No but Obama wins. Weapons >>> martial arts.
It's why people brought weapons to battlefields in ancient Japan and China, as opposed to running out and swinging their fists.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Obama is bigger, younger and black.He'd probably win in a fighter.
Taller? Yes. Bigger? I'm not so sure about that. Looks to me like Putin would have a weight advantage. Younger? Yes. Point taken. But, black? LOL. I don't see how you equate that with some kind of an advantage. Seriously, that's not an advantage anymore than it's a disadvantage.
Putin also has balls and, sadly, I can't say the same for our current President. Personally, I think Putin would make Obama his b**** even with Obama having a golf club.
Originally posted by Star428
Taller? Yes. Bigger? I'm not so sure about that. Looks to me like Putin would have a weight advantage. Younger? Yes. Point taken. But, black? LOL. I don't see how you equate that with some kind of an advantage. Seriously, that's not an advantage anymore than it's a disadvantage.Putin also has balls and, sadly, I can't say the same for our current President. Personally, I think Putin would make Obama his b**** even with Obama having a golf club.
Originally posted by NemeBro
lolNo but Obama wins. Weapons >>> martial arts.
It's why people brought weapons to battlefields in ancient Japan and China, as opposed to running out and swinging their fists.
They weren't exactly using golf clubs though 😕
Give Obama a Naginatta and he'd either stomp or cut his own foot like a chump.
Originally posted by JmanghanQuite possibly, yeah. It wouldn't be an easy fight for most MMA fighters. But of course, Putin is not nearly as skilled as the average MMA fighter, and isn't in nearly as good of shape.
So a random gangster with a baseball bat would beat the living hell out of an MMA fighter?
Originally posted by BentleyThe difference between a golf club and, say, a kanabo primarily lies in their relative ability to crush armour, and to a lesser extent bone. A golf club can still brain someone well-enough, and would actually probably be considerably easier to handle.
They weren't exactly using golf clubs though 😕Give Obama a Naginatta and he'd either stomp or cut his own foot like a chump.
Originally posted by NemeBro
Or you could break your fingers after you tried to stop a solid steel or iron pole with a weighted end, lol.
Again, it's breaking your fingers against getting the blunt in your skull.
While I agree that the club handles well and can be made into a proper weapon it's still not the kind of weapon that would incapacitate you fast unless you get hit in the skull. That's a world of difference against a war weapon that should at least limit your mobility with a proper hit.
Originally posted by BentleyIf you were hit with a war club (like the kanabo) in the hand, the damage would probably technically be "greater", sure, but at the end of the day that hand will still be largely incapacitated, lol. Which would put Putin at even more of a disadvantage.
Again, it's breaking your fingers against getting the blunt in your skull.While I agree that the club handles well and can be made into a proper weapon it's still not the kind of weapon that would incapacitate you fast unless you get hit in the skull. That's a world of difference against a war weapon that should at least limit your mobility with a proper hit.
Similarly, a fighter hit with a proper blunt weapon (I am distinguishing between blunt weapons and bladed ones) in just the hand would experience a lot of pain and be unable to use that hand (just like with a golf club, lol), sure, but would still be able to otherwise move around if they could tough through the pain. A real weapon would, however, be better able to incapacitate the legs than a golf club.
I don't deny that a golf club is less effective than a real weapon. That's obvious. But the differences frankly will probably not matter, lol.