I've seen some say this was meant so people could refuse service to gays if they want. I think the example a person used was something like "a bakery should have the right to serve or not serve whoever they want".
I only agree in the sense of..they need a good reason for it. If two gay guys are walking into the bakery giving each other handjobs or banging each other right out in the open, sure I can see refusing service. Though then again that is less refusing someone for being gay and more just refusing someone for being indecent. They'd do the same to a straight couple who began banging in the bakery.
Originally posted by Reflassshh
Nuke Indiana and problem solved.
Nooo, I have a cottage in South Bend. It's over 120 years old and already completely paid for.