Originally posted by Jmanghan
People like sports games. COD has overstayed its welcome. Duke Nukem Forever looks pretty fun to me, even if it plays pretty bad, watched Tobuscus play it back in the day and it looked epic.
I like Sports games too but there is absolutely no need to have a new one every year. More often than not each new Sports game ends up losing more good features and aspects than they introduce. I completely understand it from a business standpoint but i rarely meet any sports fan that enjoys paying $60 a year for the same exact game and experience.
Somewhere along the lines, during the past decade, Call of Duty adopted the similar ethics as, Sports games. I enjoy Call of Duty games and i hate to single the franchise out for manufacturing what is essentially the same game each year. I know that most franchises do this and have done it since the beginning of gaming. However, i'm using COD as an example to embody all of the franchises that have similar marketing tactics and development ethics. I usually tend to give COD a pass because i enjoy playing single player campaigns but somewhere along the line the single player campaigns became lackluster and sometimes even disappointing. When you consider this along with a multiplayer that is nothing more than new maps it's hard to accept that you're paying $60 for something that should and could have been a $20 DLC.
Again, i do enjoy Call of duty and i'm not criticizing the game play but rather the necessity of one to two new games every year. NHL 14 played well and looked nice but did it accomplish or offer anything that 13 didn't? No, it didn't.
As for Duke Nukem forever...,the game is bad and was a waste of resources. I'm not questioning whether or not these games are fun. If you want to have a good time with something, you're going to. I can find a way to have a good time while playing with a bucket of Sh*t but that doesn't mean i want to pay $60 to do so.
Originally posted by jinXed by JaNxGood Thing DNF is only $4 then, eh?
I like Sports games too but there is absolutely no need to have a new one every year. More often than not each new Sports game ends up losing more good features and aspects than they introduce. I completely understand it from a business standpoint but i rarely meet any sports fan that enjoys paying $60 a year for the same exact game and experience.Somewhere along the lines, during the past decade, Call of Duty adopted the similar ethics as, Sports games. I enjoy Call of Duty games and i hate to single the franchise out for manufacturing what is essentially the same game each year. I know that most franchises do this and have done it since the beginning of gaming. However, i'm using COD as an example to embody all of the franchises that have similar marketing tactics and development ethics. I usually tend to give COD a pass because i enjoy playing single player campaigns but somewhere along the line the single player campaigns became lackluster and sometimes even disappointing. When you consider this along with a multiplayer that is nothing more than new maps it's hard to accept that you're paying $60 for something that should and could have been a $20 DLC.
Again, i do enjoy Call of duty and i'm not criticizing the game play but rather the necessity of one to two new games every year. NHL 14 played well and looked nice but did it accomplish or offer anything that 13 didn't? No, it didn't.As for Duke Nukem forever...,the game is bad and was a waste of resources. I'm not questioning whether or not these games are fun. If you want to have a good time with something, you're going to. I can find a way to have a good time while playing with a bucket of Sh*t but that doesn't mean i want to pay $60 to do so.
I forgot to say this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_aXcH1zDEE
Originally posted by Quincy
If you're playing a telltale game for "the fights" you're shopping wrong
Oh, no, I love TWD and the Game of Thrones games to death, and the Tales of the Borderlands was hilarious and had some cool moments.
However, The Wolf Among Us... eh...
I never caught on very well and my decisions didn't affext my game as well as they could.
The story was really weird and uninteresting and I didn't care for it.
The only times I felt bad during the game was when Vivienne died.
Shame the Duke Nukem Forever that we got didn't look like this one
Originally posted by Smasandian
Yeah, that would of been good if it was released in 2001 but who knows if the game even resembled that.
Felt like Gearbox butchered it with what 3D Realms handed over to them
last i heard they're working on concepts for a new game & are looking for another studio to help them with it..........ugh, Didn't learn from Aliens: Colonial Marines did we Mr Pitchford
http://venturebeat.com/2015/07/15/gearbox-wants-to-make-a-new-duke-nukem-game-with-a-little-help/