Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Yes and there according to the butt hurt crowd he was not trying to save anyone or do much of anything for anyone but himself.
Its funny you get mad at "MOS damage control squad" yet continue attacking others and are still on your quest to try to sway people minds at the horrible portrayal of superman in MOS.
anyhow not going into this again.
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
I really don't care, you been crying about the damage for two years. Then gave avengers a pass. It's bias journalism.
Dont know how many times must I explain why i didnt like MOS. You dont seem to get it or you just lump me in together with everyone else.
Ill keep it short again.
SUPERMAN's portrayal in MOS was horrible.
Dark brooding tone doesnt suit Superman. He isnt batman.
Plot and stupid decisions by various characters.
Forced emotional scenes that fail imo.
Superman at the end of the movie is more of a feared type of being than a symbol for hope.
and more stuff i dont feel like typing.
I dont really care how much destruction he caused or that he snapped zods neck.
The movie didnt do a good job of making me think Superman gave a shit about what happened. In the end he destroyed that military satellite and if that wasn't enough he just leaves the tons of wreckage there for them to clean up. He just flies away lol. All while acting like a douche.
Ill save this so next time you "forget" why i dint like MOS, ill just post this again.
AOU sacrificed alot of screen time showing them saving lives and actually feeling bad about what was happening.
I guess they could have used that screen time for more "destruction porn" right? Or more dick measuring "feats".
Totally different way the destruction and casualties were handled in both films.
Not fair to compare both films in that respect like you been trying to do.