Originally posted by Silent Master
It didn't say that Thor might have won, it flat out states that Thor would have won.Are you going to accept what the wiki you posted states or are you going to prove your hypocrisy to the entire board?
Again its an assumption!! The Wiki is assuming something that didnt happened. Lol. When in my entire debate did i used suppository evidence?
The evidence i gave is based on actual statements and known things. Like the one where Banner himself claimed in Avangers to have shot him.
Now if you want me to use foretelling evidence i can bring it. And am sure you dont want that.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Again its an assumption!! The Wiki is assuming something that didnt happened. Lol. When in my entire debate did i used suppository evidence?The evidence i gave is based on actual statements and known things. Like the one where Banner himself claimed in Avangers to have shot him.
Now if you want me to use foretelling evidence i can bring it. And am sure you dont want that.
The wiki flat out says that Thor would have won.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
But you admit Thor was about to beat Hulk until the GM interfered right? Because Wiki says so..
The wiki has the right to draw its own prediction on the movie.
I can draw my own predictions.
Thats why the movie decided for the GM to stop the fight. To leave a cliffhanger.
Its to the watchers criteria to draw their conclusions on the fight.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
The wiki has the right to draw its own prediction on the movie.I can draw my own predictions.
Thats why the movie decided for the GM to stop the fight. To leave a cliffhanger.
Its to the watchers criteria to draw their conclusions on the fight.
Ah so you admit Wiki Just states it’s own opinions and that nothing stated is necessarily Canon.
Ergo Hulk’s superior regeneration to Thor is not Canon 👆