Originally posted by Sin I AMHawkeye's hit his target when his life, the Avengers' lives and the entire world's existence depended on it. He's not exactly useless.
He's not hitting night wing with an arrow if his life depended on it, this will come down to h2h
But Grayson would/should be closing the gap for H2H. Are we using the new Agent 37 persona or sticking with classic Nightwing?
Originally posted by Sin I AMyeah, because clint totally doesn't have aoe arrows (explosive, knockout gas, hardening foam, net, etc.). You act as if he has to hit nightwing outright; meanwhile, he actually just has to get close to him with arrows like that. Also, Dick is surely not going to dodge every arrow; he'll most likely try to block several of them (at least the ones that he can't dodge) and that presents a good opportunity for clint to use his explosive arrows. I'm not saying that hawkeye wins, but you are definitely underestimating him.
Dodging isn't his only option, Dick is also very accurate with projectiles as seen below.
Clint is simply outclassed, Dick has been evading automatic gunfire, missiles and sniper fire since age 10. He is too agile, fast, skilled, and experience for Clint.
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad166/themanwonder/Agility-Speed/grayson1-speedingtrain.jpg
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad166/themanwonder/Good%20Showings/ww165-sthenobeheaded.jpg
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad166/themanwonder/Marksmenship/nw97-sticktrick.jpg
Originally posted by riv6672
Clint is hardly a no name bad guy with a gun.
Originally posted by Supermutant
So you are stating that Hawkeye is more agile, fast, skilled and/or experience than Dick?
I'm not saying you're stupid but, you post like you choose to not understand what people are actually saying.
Maybe you just like to be contrary.
Again, NOT saying you're stupid.
Originally posted by riv6672
Yeah. You're a dumbass. 🙂
Great job with that proof of how Clint is better than NW. thumbsup
Clint is hardly a no name bad guy with a gun.
Its obvious that Clint who has at least 3 names is > than a no name.
But thank you for pointing out the obvious than crying when I purposefully didn't give you credit for stating the obvious.
