Originally posted by carver9These two have not met so this isn't a fact either way. I only give Thanos wins when he wins. Don't hate him because he's at the top of the mountain.
Lol...it's not called 'turning on' buddy, it's called facts. Even though I give Hulk wins against a lot of people, I also know who he can't beat. You should know these things too when sporting Thanos.
Originally posted by Time ImmemorialCarver also exposed his treacherous ways with the Hulk. He's a HanCOCK lover now.
This thread only proves carvers bullshit arguments are factually correct when he is using them. When somone else uses them, they are not valid and he laughs at them. So if he laughs at his own arguments, means he's laughing when using them for himself.Trolling 101
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
This thread only proves carvers bullshit arguments are factually correct when he is using them. When somone else uses them, they are not valid and he laughs at them. So if he laughs at his own arguments, means he's laughing when using them for himself.Trolling 101
I'm not laughing at your argument, I'm laughing at what you are trying to do and this post proves I was correct at your attempts.
Originally posted by carver9
I'm not laughing at your argument, I'm laughing at what you are trying to do and this post proves I was correct at your attempts.
Point is, you have continuously tried to prove he can amp from TIH showings, but then try and disprove he can be pierced since that was the last time he was pierced.
Caught you red handed.
Originally posted by carver9
Huh? When did I say he could be pierced or couldn't amp? I don't get it.
Oh wow, you can't read what I wrote or remember what you post?
This is typical you.
The old "when did I say that!?"
Read what I wrote again. You argued that he hasn't been pierced since before Avengers Hulk. In the Thor vs Hulk thread you said since this was Avengers showings he cannot be pierced.
Then on the other end you said he could amp still, because he could in TIH. So what you are doing is being a sore loser. You want to argue against a previous showing if it looks bad for you and say it doesn't count since its Avengers showings, but at the same time you want to say he can amp still, even though he hasn't amped since TIH.
So your just trolling
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Oh wow, you can't read what I wrote or remember what you post?This is typical you.
The old "when did I say that!?"
Read what I wrote again. You argued that he hasn't been pierced since before Avengers Hulk. In the Thor vs Hulk thread you said since this was Avengers showings he cannot be pierced.
Then on the other end you said he could amp still, because he could in TIH. So what you are doing is being a sore loser. You want to argue against a previous showing if it looks bad for you and say it doesn't count since its Avengers showings, but at the same time you want to say he can amp still, even though he hasn't amped since TIH.
So your just trolling
Lol...Show me where I argued against you about him being pierced or amping, etc... I'm sticking by that argument but Hulk still lose this match. You're debating nonsense; Hancock wins this, even if Hulk can amp or have a strong hide. Now do you get it?
doesnt matter if hulk can amp or has a strong hide, the hulk can be knocked out as we have seen when he was taken to high altitudes and oxygen deprived as well as freezing his green ass off (bana hulk i think)
if hancock can hold him underwater long enough or (more likely) send him into orbit (which he is easilly capable of doing) then it is instant win to hancock.
especially if the hulk falls, i know he fell in avengers and reverted to banner but a higher fall would probably kill him if he wasn't suffocated first
Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Hancock wins. Bit of a mismatch really. Hulk's strength isn't going to help against a guy who is literally invulnerable without his partner nearby. People really shouldn't use Hancock or Mary for fights. Until we get a sequel, there is no way of knowing how much it'd take to actually hurt either of them, or if it is even possible without special circumstances.
This logic makes no sense. His durability when he's not weakened by vagina..I mean his partner, is..well, whatever the highest level of durability he showed. He took a rocket I think. Bullets. Super powered hits from someone who just being near can sap his powers. He has his "not be even budged by a train" feat. We definitely have some benchmark.
What I'm saying is if Hancock decided to just stand there and let Hulk wail on him I don't think he could just sit there and take it indefinitely without harm. With all that said, Hancock still can just toss Hulk into space. I did not see a BFR ban, and Hancock will have have zero problems tossing a green monster into space.