Anti-Monitor & Darkseid Vs Thanos & Galactus

Started by Golgo134 pages
Originally posted by Genii96
But the UN is part of him,so it counts as man to man

No weapons for anyone. Just mano y mano.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
^ except...it didn't destroy him at all?

You actually manage to confuse yourself

He did it with help of Strange and Vishanti.

Alone he would've died.

Originally posted by Genii96
1) Nowhere there in those scans did It even ention he was fed,infact we see him say the hunger is on him,now if you are going to tell me that galactus goes from being sated to being hungry because of a blast from thanos,which thanos himself admits didn't do squat,and then a blast from galactus which oneshotted thanos, you are realling grasping for straws here
So he got hungry but before being hungry, he was actually hungry?

That's some logic right there. Galactus says "I'm hungry now" but it actually means "No, I was hungry even before I fought Thanos."

😂

2)Galactus,fully fed on one planet?,my goodness
Haha, shut up already if you're so ignorant.

Do you want me to post all those scans of Galactus being fed after eating one planet?

3)He outperformed an entire group of celestials,arishem includes THAT is the feat,not what he did to the engine
He didn't outperform shit. He just stood there while others retreated. There is no proof that Galactus was there because he was more powerful or anything.

4) Clearly you haven't,if you think it kills the user.
Name one time anybody has used it and it doesn't kills the user. Like Morg? Or like Reed?

5) That scan shoes galan taking a cheapshot from an attack composed of 5CCUs,and reforming himself,yea,low end feat right?

Magus flat out said its just a solar system level blast and Galactus had warning that an energy blast is coming his way.

"Solar system" level blast killed Galactus. Chew on that for awhile.

Originally posted by abhilegend
So he got hungry but before being hungry, he was actually hungry?

That's some logic right there. Galactus says "I'm hungry now" but it actually means "No, I was hungry even before I fought Thanos."

😂

Haha, shut up already if you're so ignorant.

Do you want me to post all those scans of Galactus being fed after eating one planet?

He didn't outperform shit. He just stood there while others retreated. There is no proof that Galactus was there because he was more powerful or anything.

Name one time anybody has used it and it doesn't kills the user. Like Morg? Or like Reed?

Magus flat out said its just a solar system level blast and Galactus had warning that an energy blast is coming his way.

"Solar system" level blast killed Galactus. Chew on that for awhile.

1) It means he wasn't anywhere near well fed smartass,if one blast made the hunger come,clearly his energues were already reduced,this isn't rocket science.

2)When you learn the difference between being fed and fully fed,then you can come back. One planet is enough to stave off his hunger,that is all.

3)Oh yes I am sure being able to fight against the engine that killed celestials and caused others to flee,hold it back alone means he didn't outperform the celestials there. Ridiculous

4)Seeing as galactus himself is still alive,that kinda shits on that theory,reed didn't die after using it on abraxas either. Are you saying galactus who planned to use the UN on abraxas,was planning on dying and releasing him again? Lol.

5) Except galactus didn't die,and the only reason he even needed help was because death,one of the most powerful abstracts tried to stop him from merely reforming himself and everybody else,nothing to do with the CCU attack,which galactus wasn't even impressed by. Oh and how fed was galan then huh?

Galactus has vaped galaxies as a side effect to a fight while weakened,faced of tenebrous who is easily above universal while weakened,caused a multidimensional collapse in his fight with agamotto while not well fed. A fed galactus nearly collapsed the multiverse as a side effect to a fight. You chew on that for a while.

Originally posted by Genii96
1) It means he wasn't anywhere near well fed smartass,if one blast made the hunger come,clearly his energues were already reduced,this isn't rocket science.
Circular logic FTW. There is no well fed Galactus. Either he is hungry or he is fed. More than one planet means he is amped.

2)When you learn the difference between being fed and fully fed,then you can come back. One planet is enough to stave off his hunger,that is all.

Can you post a single scan where he ate a planet and isn't fed? And post a scan of fully fed Galactus while you're at it.

3)Oh yes I am sure being able to fight against the engine that killed celestials and caused others to flee,hold it back alone means he didn't outperform the celestials there. Ridiculous

No celestials were killed. Read the damn comic. And he just stood there, having no effect on Engine.

4)Seeing as galactus himself is still alive,that kinda shits on that theory,reed didn't die after using it on abraxas either.

When did Galactus used UN? You know Morg died using it, right? And Reed destroyed entire universe and himself. The universe just rebooted without Abraxas.
Are you saying galactus who planned to use the UN on abraxas,was planning on dying and releasing him again? Lol.
Did you even read the comic? Honest question.

5) Except galactus didn't die,and the only reason he even needed help was because death,one of the most powerful abstracts tried to stop him from merely reforming himself and everybody else,nothing to do with the CCU attack,which galactus wasn't even impressed by. Oh and how fed was galan then huh?

Galactus actually died there. Read the damn comic. He didn't needed help against Death as she was unable to directly influence anybody there. He was fed at that point. Getting disintegrated don't impress Galactus? Lulz.

Galactus has vaped galaxies as a side effect to a fight while weakened,faced of tenebrous who is easily above universal while weakened,caused a multidimensional collapse in his fight with agamotto while not well fed. A fed galactus nearly collapsed the multiverse as a side effect to a fight. You chew on that for a while.

Galactus has never destroyed Galactus while fighting someone, that was a speculation from Thanos.

Tenebrous is all hype.

Multidimensional collapse? When?

French and British armies fighting nearly collapsed a significant portion of omniverse once in Exiles.

http://i.imgur.com/aWDQswP.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/pHLtVdP.jpg?1

That feat is so much higher than anything Galactus has done, you better forget about using it.

Bump.

vin

Hmmmm. COIE Antimonitor would stomp, but if Galactus uses the Ultimate Nullifier then i guess Galactus' team should win.

AM solos

the true multiversal New Gods abstract version of Darkseid likely solos as well

Darkseid simply handwaves them for existence

Darkseid or Anti Monitor solos team 2.

Team 1 consist of two megaversal entities, versus two less than universal entities.

Galactus wins it for team Marvel.

Originally posted by Board Walker
Darkseid or Anti Monitor solos team 2.

Team 1 consist of two megaversal entities, versus two less than universal entities.

Megaversal? Lol