Also blasters hit storm troopers and somehow take them out without seeming to even damage the suit, right? At least in the original trilogy.
Also curious, what is canon..original versions of the original trilogy, or the latest versions released? One would have to assume the latest versions.
I only ask because I do not recall the blast that Han avoids in the bar having the power of a grenade.
Originally posted by SurturLatesf versions of the film. I've also cited examples of the blasters being pathetic when it hits flesh. No one exaggerates better than a Star Wars fanboy. Greeghan wins.
Also blasters hit storm troopers and somehow take them out without seeming to even damage the suit, right? At least in the original trilogy.Also curious, what is canon..original versions of the original trilogy, or the latest versions released? One would have to assume the latest versions.
I only ask because I do not recall the blast that Han avoids in the bar having the power of a grenade.
Originally posted by RobtardSo you believe that Jedi is just as durable as Greeghan ? Lol.
Nah, as noted Jango killed a Jedi Master and despite your silly(and pathetic?) attempts to nerf Jango's blasters, they have the ability to kill, as shown.
He was also featless. What happened when Jango went up against Jedi with feats ? Did he win ?
Originally posted by RobtardWithout flight capabilities and the beast also got up close and personal to Jango damaging his jet pack. The beast just charged and didn't have flight capabilities either. So now you're claiming the beast is comparable to Greeghan ?
LoL, you're so awful at this, it's actually hilarious how little you know about Star Wars. Anyhow.Fact: Jango one-shot a massive 2,400lbs thick-skinned Reek in EP2: AOTC. /thread
But you go on pretending his blasters shoot nerf pellets and it's flip time 👆
😂
Originally posted by RobtardWhen aimed properly I never said it couldn't. It isn't that powerful though which is my point you seem hell bent on ignoring.
Point: It proves Jango's blasters can kill with a single shot, even a massive thick-skinned beast.You have nothing except downplaying so you lost again. Deal with it.
I have not downplayed anything . At no point did I say Greeghan is immune to those blasts. I believe his flight capability, strength, speed will be too much for Jango to overcome.m. Keep in mind Obi was saberless and Jango flew right in his direction like an idiot. Obi then disarmed the bounty hunter and he lacks Greeghan's flight and power.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I know he killed a Jedi. Now give feats for this Jedi. If you can't give any feats then it isn't as impressive since he was featless.
You can't be this dumb can you? In order for him to be a jedi that INHERIENTLY means he's above peak human with added abilities to boot. Just by being a jedi we know this to be true. Now when you add that he's a council member and Jedi Master.. then we can say he's even above the average jedi. Are you telling me he got to said position by being "featless" as you call it? Or can we logically assume he has had to accomplish a great number of feats and be better than the average jedi (who also have feats) to be a council member? Wouldn't that be the logically deduction there.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiHe's featless and far below Obi, etc. featless means he has no feats. We can make the case for anyone in this manner. The shield agents are trained featless agents. They still possess skill such as the Jedi but since there is no context to his feats compiled with the relative ease in which he was defeated and the conclusion becomes painfully obvious. Not that impressive.
You can't be this dumb can you? In order for him to be a jedi that INHERIENTLY means he's above peak human with added abilities to boot. Just by being a jedi we know this to be true. Now when you add that he's a council member and Jedi Master.. then we can say he's even above the average jedi. Are you telling me he got to said position by being "featless" as you call it? Or can we logically assume he has had to accomplish a great number of feats and be better than the average jedi (who also have feats) to be a council member? Wouldn't that be the logically deduction there.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He's featless and far below Obi, etc. featless means he has no feats. We can make the case for anyone in this manner. The shield agents are trained featless agents. They still possess skill such as the Jedi but since there is no context to his feats compiled with the relative ease in which he was defeated and the conclusion becomes painfully obvious. Not that impressive.
It's a logical line of deduction though. If you're a council member and a master it stands to reason you have feats. I also stands to reason you're above Jedi who aren't council members. Do you agree with all of this? So if we know average jedi are capable of "x" .. why wouldn't we assume a council member is even better? We should and would. You have to give a basic amount of credit and logic dictates certain things about people. If somebody is just an army officer.. we know they have a certain level of training in a variety of ways in the art of war. Now if somebody is a Navy Seal, yet get killed early on to make the bad guy seem more impressive. That doesn't mean we assume he's a bumbling moron that got killed. It's the opposite. We assume that since he's a green beret or a Navy Seal he's considerably above a normal soldier. This has to be the logical line of progression. Doesn't mean we go so far as to say they are the best of the best or uber awesome. However, just being a Navy Seal means he's impressive and it's impressive the bad guy was able to kill him. It would be moronic to go... oh he was featless so who cares. That is what you're doing here... You're going oh he was featless... umm no... Just being a council member means he's not featless. Just being a Master means the same thing. He's probably pretty bad ass.
Also, he wasn't easily killed. He wasn't even trying to attack Jango at all and had his attention diverted on his main target.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiNo, you can't just make thing as up. I didn't say this Jedi was a bumbling moron but considering how easily he was dealt with he isn't close to Obi wan level. That's a fair assessment. Quit ignoring a what we did see in favor of what we didn't see. I'm very good at debating. 🙂
It's a logical line of deduction though. If you're a council member and a master it stands to reason you have feats. I also stands to reason you're above Jedi who aren't council members. Do you agree with all of this? So if we know average jedi are capable of "x" .. why wouldn't we assume a council member is even better? We should and would. You have to give a basic amount of credit and logic dictates certain things about people. If somebody is just an army officer.. we know they have a certain level of training in a variety of ways in the art of war. Now if somebody is a Navy Seal, yet get killed early on to make the bad guy seem more impressive. That doesn't mean we assume he's a bumbling moron that got killed. It's the opposite. We assume that since he's a green beret or a Navy Seal he's considerably above a normal soldier. This has to be the logical line of progression. Doesn't mean we go so far as to say they are the best of the best or uber awesome. However, just being a Navy Seal means he's impressive and it's impressive the bad guy was able to kill him. It would be moronic to go... oh he was featless so who cares. That is what you're doing here... You're going oh he was featless... umm no... Just being a council member means he's not featless. Just being a Master means the same thing. He's probably pretty bad ass.Also, he wasn't easily killed. He wasn't even trying to attack Jango at all and had his attention diverted on his main target.
Don't you think it's odd you pat yourself on the back but nobody else does? What does that say about how good of a debater you truly are when nobody gives you credit for being a good debater. In fact it's the opposite, people laugh at your debating skills. I mean I get trying to pick yourself up after being kicked around on here, but really, to pat yourself on the back is pretty silly don't ya think?
Nobody is giving him feats. There are BASIC feats he must have in order to be a council member. There is a certain level of skill required in order to be above others and a council member right? Would you agree with that? So let's not act like he's a nobody who's done nothing is the point.
Why do you keep saying he wasn't impressive. He wasn't even attacking the guy that killed him. He was focused on Dooku and get killed from the side. Why do you think was so unimpressive about that? So if you get cheapshotted from the side by the guy you're fighting friend... would it be fair for others to go... yeah Quan really wasn't that impressive that fight? Of course not.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiPeople have admitted to taking opposite stances just to oppose me. That's a testament to how emotionally invested against me most of you are. I enjoy destroying your horrible points with evidence and logic.
Don't you think it's odd you pat yourself on the back but nobody else does? What does that say about how good of a debater you truly are when nobody gives you credit for being a good debater. In fact it's the opposite, people laugh at your debating skills. I mean I get trying to pick yourself up after being kicked around on here, but really, to pat yourself on the back is pretty silly don't ya think?Nobody is giving him feats. There are BASIC feats he must have in order to be a council member. There is a certain level of skill required in order to be above others and a council member right? Would you agree with that? So let's not act like he's a nobody who's done nothing is the point.
Why do you keep saying he wasn't impressive. He wasn't even attacking the guy that killed him. He was focused on Dooku and get killed from the side. Why do you think was so unimpressive about that? So if you get cheapshotted from the side by the guy you're fighting friend... would it be fair for others to go... yeah Quan really wasn't that impressive that fight? Of course not.
He blocked a blast so he was focused on Jango but was unable to last more than a few seconds. That's pathetic in comparison to other Jedi against Jango. Boom.
That has nothing to do with the fact that nobody compliments you on your debating skills. THAT is the point. Nobody pats you on the back but yourself. Which only further proves the point that you're not a good debater. If you were people would recognize you as such and comment on it like they do others. Instead they laugh at you and mock your "debating" skills. Seems like a good debater wouldn't have lost every battlezone he was in.
Nope... he was looking away... he block a few when he wasn't even paying any attention to him. that only proves his skill not dismisses is.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiUnlike you I don't need to be reassured due to an insecurity issue. You're weak. I haven't. Quit lying. But how many have you done ?
That has nothing to do with the fact that nobody compliments you on your debating skills. THAT is the point. Nobody pats you on the back but yourself. Which only further proves the point that you're not a good debater. If you were people would recognize you as such and comment on it like they do others. Instead they laugh at you and mock your "debating" skills. Seems like a good debater wouldn't have lost every battlezone he was in.Nope... he was looking away... he block a few when he wasn't even paying any attention to him. that only proves his skill not dismisses is.
So he didn't block a blast and got lucky because Jango is a bad shot ? Jango easily overwhelmed the featless Jedi. The guy was a scrub by comparison to Obi.