Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
This is some serious low balling here, regardless of how much quan has made you hate Khan.
LoL, dude, people are not lowballing. Worf's not your average Klingon, not by a long shot.
During the Dominion War he was captured and forced to fight Jem'Hadar* soldiers day after day deathmatch style, only being allowed a night's rest to heal/recover between matches.
*Jem'Hader are genetically engineered super-soldiers several times stronger than humans, highly trained/conditioned and physically tough enough to resist the stun setting on phasers.
Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, dude, people are not lowballing. Worf's not your average Klingon, not by a long shot.During the Dominion War he was captured and forced to fight Jem'Hadar* soldiers day after day deathmatch style, only being allowed a night's rest to heal/recover between matches.
*Jem'Hader are genetically engineered super-soldiers several times stronger than humans, highly trained/conditioned and physically tough enough to resist the stun setting on phasers.
An Khan resisted the stun setting as well. Can you show me at least one feat of Warf above Khans?
Originally posted by Robtard
Has everyone here seen seasons 4-7 of DS9?
those are the best years of ds9
Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, dude, people are not lowballing. Worf's not your average Klingon, not by a long shot.During the Dominion War he was captured and forced to fight Jem'Hadar* soldiers day after day deathmatch style, only being allowed a night's rest to heal/recover between matches.
*Jem'Hader are genetically engineered super-soldiers several times stronger than humans, highly trained/conditioned and physically tough enough to resist the stun setting on phasers.
damn effing straight
Originally posted by RobtardA handful of Son'a overcame Worf easily in Star Trek Insurrection. The Son'a were pitiful.
Fighting a bunch of guys (and winning all except the last round) that are similar to Khan physically(superior strength, senses, resilience), would probably be a good mention and factor in this fight.
😂
Khan rage stomps this overrated mess.
Originally posted by quanchi112
A handful of Son'a overcame Worf easily in Star Trek Insurrection. The Son'a were pitiful.😂
Khan rage stomps this overrated mess.
Yeah, that doesn't dismiss what I said about Worf in DS9, which is the Worf specified here.
You haven't seen DS9, so you have no idea what you're talking about and you're doing your usual lowballing for the guy you need to see lose. Watch DS9; then argue.
Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, that doesn't dismiss what I said about Worf in DS9, which is the Worf specified here.You haven't seen DS9, so you have no idea what you're talking about and you're doing your usual lowballing for the guy you need to see lose. Watch DS9; then argue.
Oh, it's DS9 era Worf? That's his peak. Not saying he'd beat Khan, but he'd smack the ever-loving shit out of Spock.
Originally posted by RobtardThat's still canon. You always want to dismiss portrayals. I've seen him go down rather easily. He looks actually pathetic in hand to hand combat as did pretty much every old trek character. That's the point.
Yeah, that doesn't dismiss what I said about Worf in DS9, which is the Worf specified here.You haven't seen DS9, so you have no idea what you're talking about and you're doing your usual lowballing for the guy you need to see lose. Watch DS9; then argue.
Feel free to compare feats though. Khan would rage stomp this loser.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He was taken rather easily. What feats does he possess that he can take on NuSpock ?
He wasn't taken easily at all.
His beating of multiple Jem-Hadar from seasons 4 through 7. His beating of multiple Klingons.
Hell, even in First Contact he was strong enough to stun Borg.
Spock has no real advantages over Worf. He has less combat experience, and there's little difference in strength, speed and stamina. Worf also has redundant organs that Spock doesn't, which means it will take more to put him down.
Have you even watched DS9?
Originally posted by quanchi112
That's still canon. You always want to dismiss portrayals. I've seen him go down rather easily. He looks actually pathetic in hand to hand combat as did pretty much every old trek character. That's the point.Feel free to compare feats though. Khan would rage stomp this loser.
That's straight up false. Literally a lie. Are you even trying to debate, or are you just trying to get a rise out of people?
Originally posted by -Pr-Khan crushed an entire squad of Klingons singlehandedly by himself according to Kirk with relative ease. He was physically raping them as well.
He wasn't taken easily at all.His beating of multiple Jem-Hadar from seasons 4 through 7. His beating of multiple Klingons.
Hell, even in First Contact he was strong enough to stun Borg.Spock has no real advantages over Worf. He has less combat experience, and there's little difference in strength, speed and stamina. Worf also has redundant organs that Spock doesn't, which means it will take more to put him down.
Have you even watched DS9?
The Borg were awfully slow and terrible in terms of quickness and movement.
Nerve pinch, feats, athleticism, skill. When has Worf matched Spock's superhuman athleticism chasing down and leaping after Khan in Into Darkness. Spock's physical prowess and skill look leaps and bounds greater than the awful display of skill demonstrated by Worf on screen.
Originally posted by RobtardSo you want to pretend he wasn't easily taken in Insurrection and just only this counts type stuff. Let's go feat for feat. Khan crushes this losers skull. Your fanboyism doesn't change that. NuTrek rapes here.
Why bother, Pr? You know quan's not watched DS9 and is ignorant of the character, all of that on top of his typical lowballing and lies for the characters he hates and needs to see lose.