A vague answer which states nothing relevant. Khan wins. One shot.
GEN
Genesis-Soldiergod blessed him with a...
you havent been able to prove any of your claims quan
but hey its good to see you are upping my post count so good for you
QUA
quanchi112Disney
Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier you havent been able to prove any of your claims quan
but hey its good to see you are upping my post count so good for you
Irony. One shot is all Khan needs until you back your insane claims.
GEN
Genesis-Soldiergod blessed him with a...
prove it, i disproved the boolean gun so khan has nothing
QUA
quanchi112Disney
Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier prove it, i disproved the boolean gun so khan has nothing
No, you didn't you made a baseless claim. You conceded.
GEN
Genesis-Soldiergod blessed him with a...
proved it and critiqued it, your move lad
QUA
quanchi112Disney
Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier proved it and critiqued it, your move lad
No, you didn't you used conjecture. Try again.
GEN
Genesis-Soldiergod blessed him with a...
proved it wasn't an accurate source and it was bias
QUA
quanchi112Disney
Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier proved it wasn't an accurate source and it was bias
You posted it and failed to back your claim.
GEN
Genesis-Soldiergod blessed him with a...
proved it now prove me wrong, i know you cant because you cant post any evidence
QUA
quanchi112Disney
Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier proved it now prove me wrong, i know you cant because you cant post any evidence
I don't have to disprove your claim you have to prove it. Debating 101.
GEN
Genesis-Soldiergod blessed him with a...
to which i did with evident, evidence is debating 101 fool
QUA
quanchi112Disney
Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier to which i did with evident, evidence is debating 101 fool
Evident, eh ? No, you didn't.
GEN
Genesis-Soldiergod blessed him with a...
evidence son, if you can't prove it then it can be stipulated. just look at science VS Religion
now back to the topic, learn to debate you butt hurt trolling goblin
QUA
quanchi112Disney
Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier evidence son, if you can't prove it then it can be stipulated. just look at science VS Religion
now back to the topic, learn to debate you butt hurt trolling goblin
You provided a link yourself and the turned away from it. Get your shit together, kid.
GEN
Genesis-Soldiergod blessed him with a...
provided a link that you would not and proved through it that it was a bias source that could non the less not hurt john
where is your evidence to suggest it could ?
QUA
quanchi112Disney
Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier provided a link that you would not and proved through it that it was a bias source that could non the less not hurt john
where is your evidence to suggest it could ?
Simole he's never tanked anything more powerful and the no limits fallacy.
GEN
Genesis-Soldiergod blessed him with a...
-sighs- bunker busting explosion, extremely effective emp lancer (effective because it will hurt john's nanos on a massive level
QUA
quanchi112Disney
Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier -sighs- bunker busting explosion, extremely effective emp lancer (effective because it will hurt john's nanos on a massive level
That isn't proof. A wider range doesn't prove greater power, kiddo.