Global Cooling

Started by Time-Immemorial2 pages

Global Cooling

http://www.sciencealert.com/a-mini-ice-age-is-coming-in-the-next-15-years

Scientist now say we are going from global warming to cooling and we will see an mini ice age in 15 years. Gotta love their flip flops. I bet Al Gore and all the global warming hippies have no comment. Remember carbon tax 😂

Re: Global Cooling

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
http://www.sciencealert.com/a-mini-ice-age-is-coming-in-the-next-15-years

Scientist now say we are going from global warming to cooling and we will see an mini ice age in 15 years. Gotta love their flip flops. I bet Al Gore and all the global warming hippies have no comment. Remember carbon tax 😂

"Solar activity is predicted to drop by 60 percent in 2030."

Thank God. I can't stand hot, humid weather.

Re: Re: Global Cooling

Originally posted by Robtard
"Solar activity is predicted to drop by 60 percent in 2030."

Are you trolling? Why quote me with something in the article?

Re: Re: Re: Global Cooling

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Are you trolling?

Why quote me with something in the article?

Not trolling.

Man-man Global Warming/climatic change is about humanity affecting the Earth via green house gases, deforestation and such. The Sun is another matter.

Which was never proven and they gave up the idea.

Research is still actively going. Even the Pope has jumped on board and pissed off people with his ""Laudato si" letter.

The carbon tax idea was fraud, just like every other fraud they feed us and make us pay for.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Which was never proven and they gave up the idea.

I am not sure I understand what you mean. Do you think the scientific community has given up on man-made climate change?

Arnt you tired of getting blamed for living?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Arnt you tired of getting blamed for living?

I'm not sure how to answer that. I just wondered if what I asked is what you meant or whether maybe you meant something different.

It's a very easy answer im sorry you can't answer it.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
It's a very easy answer im sorry you can't answer it.

It's not very easy, because it's a loaded question. It presupposes that I am or feel blamed for living. Which I do not.

Well you are. You can't change this fact. If liberals can find an issue they use that issue to create controversy and a tax, more control and loss of freedom for the "greater good" that they made up in the first place.

Personally, I'd prefer technologies with less waste products that don't pollute the environment. I don't see that as a loss of freedom, I see that as a cause to inspire innovation and technological advancement, which in turn could create new capitalist markets and jobs.

Point is we don't cause global warming, we never did. We are not going to cause a cooling unless somehow science can prove we damage the sun now😂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Point is we don't cause global warming, we never did. We are not going to cause a cooling unless somehow science can prove we damage the sun now😂

You understand that the scientific community still thinks (based on a lot of evidence) that we man-made climate change exists, yes?

No proof, cept for Chem trails and geo engineering.

The position on the part of Climate Change Supporters is that we are releasing more gas emissions than would normally be present in our atmosphere (which is a fact since we burn fossil fuels) while simultaneously removing the natural checks for those emissions (deforestation and sea plant destruction coupled with mass farming, since those organisms would normally intake the extra CO2 and other gases we're pumping into the atmosphere).

Now, we don't put out the levels that, say, a volcanic eruption does, but over time we are altering the chemical balance of our atmosphere (more methane and CO2) and could, if left unchecked, cause a runaway greenhouse effect (the gas balance reaches a point where Earth traps more heat). The argument is really about how far out we are from that occurring, if at all. I don't think it's a big threat for the next 100 years, if not longer, and the planet has been hotter, more oxygen rich, and had more volcanic activity in the past and supported life. It's really about how we can try to maintain hospitable conditions for humans for as long as possible within the factors under our control. We might not kill off all life on Earth or turn Earth into Venus atmospherically, but we could f*ck up the food table on this planet so much that eventually things get arid and food becomes scarce for a population of billions upon billions, though we have millions starving as things stand now. IMO, that's a legit issue, primarily because I actually care about my fellow man and not just my own interests, though I don't think we're gonna have "The Day After Tomorrow" like weather catastrophes occurring, and that's where the scare tactics and BS starts to come into play. At the end of the day we DO need better, cleaner technology and better resource management, and in my opinion, that's a priority.