Iranian Agreement goes through

"The reason we designed our missiles with a range of 2,000 km is to be able to hit our enemy the Zionist regime from a safe distance," Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh was quoted as saying by the ISNA agency. The nearest point in Iran is around 1,000 km (621 miles) from Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-missiles-idUSKCN0WB0I9

😂

Originally posted by Robtard
Considering they have a lot more to lose than gain if they renege on the deal, why do you think they're lying about not being the one to start a war?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
[b]"The reason we designed our missiles with a range of 2,000 km is to be able to hit our enemy the Zionist regime from a safe distance," Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh was quoted as saying by the ISNA agency. The nearest point in Iran is around 1,000 km (621 miles) from Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-missiles-idUSKCN0WB0I9

😂 [/B]

How is that shocking/surprising though?

Israel sees Iran as an enemy and has threatened to preemptive strike on more than one occasion. Why wouldn't Iran make preparations to fight their enemy in return?

My god people here really believe Iranian leaders?

And Robtard's antisemitism rears it's ugly head.

Do you see how they are pro Iran, they ok with giving them nukes, firing off missiles that violated UN resolutions.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-missiles-idUSKCN0WA0UY

Originally posted by Slay
And Robtard's antisemitism rears it's ugly head.

If this is you then I like you and apologize if I was wrong

Originally posted by Raisen
My god people here really believe Iranian leaders?

It's believing people will do what's in their best interest and engaging in a losing war probably isn't it

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Do you see how they are pro Iran, they ok with giving them nukes, firing off missiles that violated UN resolutions.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-missiles-idUSKCN0WA0UY

-Not pro Iran, personally don't care for Theocratic regimes, Muslim or otherwise

-The deal bars Iran from getting nukes; not giving them nukes

-If they actually did violate the deal, then there should be an adequate level of punishment

But we've done this before

Originally posted by Raisen
My god people here really believe Iranian leaders?

So because Israel has them, that means Iran should have them?

Originally posted by Robtard
It's believing people will do what's in their best interest and engaging in a losing war probably isn't it

Like you said. It's a theocracy dude. Iranians just see holy war

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Consider this: right now, even if Iran had a nuclear weapon, Israel very likely has over a hundred of them. The real threat Iran poses to Israel isn't in open warfare but in the various proxies it supports which carry out things like embassy bombings and kidnappings.

This is truthful. Still, Iran is too dangerous to even have nukes. You don't want convicted murderer having access to guns either. Same shit

Just learned today that part of the deal with the agreement is the IAEA cannot disclose if Iran has violated the terms and the agreement😂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Just learned today that part of the deal with the agreement is the IAEA cannot disclose if Iran has violated the terms and the agreement😂

Yeah. It's insane

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So because Israel has them, that means Iran should have them?

Considering N. Korea who openly makes threats has nukes, what right does the US have to tell Iran no?

Would you instead on disarming Pakistan while allowing India to keep its nukes?

This is of course aside from the fact that the deal is to stop Iran from making nukes.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So because Israel has them, that means Iran should have them?

Well given that's your logic when it comes to guns...

It's so weird that Republicans are arguing against a deal to stop nukes.

Like, really, if the basis of your argument 'against' the deal is 'they'll get nukes'? Remember the alternative is to have nothing in place to stop them from getting nukes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Considering N. Korea who openly makes threats has nukes, what right does the US have to tell Iran no?

Would you instead on disarming Pakistan while allowing India to keep its nukes?

This is of course aside from the fact that the deal is to stop Iran from making nukes.

Here you are muddying up the waters. Who else on this planet we live on threatens to wipe out other nations besides N.Korea and Iran?

It's dishonest and rude to dodge questions, only to turn around and ask them yourself

But to answer your question: Pakistan and India have threatened to nuke each other into oblivion at times

Then there was that Cuban Missile Crisis thingy, where America was involved, but that's old so let us not talk about that