Forced Chemical Castration

Started by Henry_Pym3 pages
Henry_Pym Ultron Bound

Forced Chemical Castration

As of now FL, Iowa & CA have it as a rule of Parole along with therapy for convicted pedophiles who's victim was 13 or younger.

The drug has major side effects like bone density disorders, enlarging of the breasts and hips and major physiological and personality disorders like suicidal depression.

That said it allows dangerous reoffenders to parole out and join society with very low chance of reoffending.

What are your thoughts on it being forced on these men?

red g jacks Restricted

if it works like you say it works, then yea i say do it

dadudemon Senior Member

And let it be voluntary AND with an informed decision. Have a third party who represents the interests of the offender/prisoner (like a lawyer) verify that their client is consenting.

Then let them accept the risks/side-effects and continue on.

Knife Restricted

Re: Forced Chemical Castration

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
As of now FL, Iowa & CA have it as a rule of Parole along with therapy for convicted pedophiles who's victim was 13 or younger.

The drug has major side effects like bone density disorders, enlarging of the breasts and hips and major physiological and personality disorders like suicidal depression.

That said it allows dangerous reoffenders to parole out and join society with very low chance of reoffending.

What are your thoughts on it being forced on these men?

And when people are wrongly convicted.

Henry_Pym Ultron Bound

Re: Re: Forced Chemical Castration

Originally posted by Knife
And when people are wrongly convicted.
it is partially reversible because it doesn't remove the testicles it just cuts libido and T. The loss of T is the danger though but you can get T from GMC.

dadudemon Senior Member

Re: Re: Re: Forced Chemical Castration

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
it is partially reversible because it doesn't remove the testicles it just cuts libido and T. The loss of T is the danger though but you can get T from GMC.

And that would defeat the purpose of the treatment. Increasing Test. levels, again, would just bring the libido back, again. That's what they are trying to eliminate.

Surtur Restricted

I don't know about forcing it on them, but as a condition of getting paroled? Sure. Unfortunately people who behave this way have shown drastic measures need to be taken if they want to re-enter society.

Time-Immemorial Restricted

Forced castration is to severe of a punishment, it can make you kill yourself.

Stealth Moose Umbrella Elite

*too, and it's a bit too kind for pedophiles IMO.

krisblaze Senior Member

I'd rather they castrate the rich.

Forced castration for bankers.

Impediment Endless

All sexual predators/offenders/rapists/molesters/pederasts should be executed.

Not even joking.

Robtard Senor Member

Originally posted by dadudemon
And let it be voluntary AND with an informed decision. Have a third party who represents the interests of the offender/prisoner (like a lawyer) verify that their client is consenting.

Then let them accept the risks/side-effects and continue on.

This is the sensible answer

Originally posted by Impediment
All sexual predators/offenders/rapists/molesters/pederasts should be executed.

Not even joking.

This is the not sensible answer.

Though at times I agree with it.

Adam_PoE Senior Member

I would be in favor of this if there was evidence that it works, but many offenders are not driven by sexual desire but by aggression, compulsion, sadism, etc.

It would be misguided and dangerous to parole a compulsive or sadistic offender because he is taking drugs to inhibit his sex drive but not his desire to offend.

Time-Immemorial Restricted

You guys are ****ing nuts, you support every other type of forgivness and want to chemically castrate someone?

Hell, people say sex changes should be on tax payers dime because it causes suicides, yet this does as well and you approve. Morally perverted when it does not suit your liberal agenda.

Put the person in jail for Gods sake

red g jacks Restricted

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You guys are ****ing nuts, you support every other type of forgivness and want to chemically castrate someone?

Hell, people say sex changes should be on tax payers dime because it causes suicides, yet this does as well and you approve. Morally perverted when it does not suit your liberal agenda.

Put the person in jail for Gods sake

the way i look at it is basically that they are unfixable through traditional means of rehabilitation. you might convince a gangbabger to be a productive member of society through rehab... but you will never convince a pedo not to want molest kids cause it is a peculiar and irrational crime in the first place. and hey... maybe they are born like this or develop this fetish through sexual stimuli they are exposed to growing up by no choice of their own... but that still leaves us the problem of what to do with them, cause we can't let them free to victimize children. so if chemical castration works then fine...that's a decent solution. if there's not a solution like that available then honestly its pointless locking them up for a few years and then letting them out to commit the same crime again. you might as well just execute them like a previous poster said.

riv6672 Senior Member

Re: Re: Forced Chemical Castration

Originally posted by dadudemon
And let it be voluntary AND with an informed decision. Have a third party who represents the interests of the offender/prisoner (like a lawyer) verify that their client is consenting.

Then let them accept the risks/side-effects and continue on.


This is how it pretty much has to be done.

Originally posted by Knife
And when people are wrongly convicted.

And?
No offense but this isnt even a full thought.
More like a "verbal" tick. Just throw this out there every time a subject that deals with prisoner's rights comes up.
This is no different than any other punishment meted out by the judicial system. It had to be approved, it isnt some unsanctioned endeavor.
In this case it also leaves the choice up to the individual.
These people DONT have to do it, they can always just serve their sentences.

Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You guys are ****ing nuts, you support every other type of forgivness and want to chemically castrate someone?

Hell, people say sex changes should be on tax payers dime because it causes suicides, yet this does as well and you approve. Morally perverted when it does not suit your liberal agenda.

Put the person in jail for Gods sake

I think this is mainly for people who are deemed to be a danger after they have served their time in prison.

krisblaze Senior Member

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You guys are ****ing nuts, you support every other type of forgivness and want to chemically castrate someone?

Hell, people say sex changes should be on tax payers dime because it causes suicides, yet this does as well and you approve. Morally perverted when it does not suit your liberal agenda.

Put the person in jail for Gods sake

👆

I'm with time on this one.

Killing a man or woman for banging a 13 year old....smh

Knife Restricted

Re: Re: Re: Forced Chemical Castration

Originally posted by riv6672
This is how it pretty much has to be done.

And?
No offense but this isnt even a full thought.
More like a "verbal" tick. Just throw this out there every time a subject that deals with prisoner's rights comes up.
This is no different than any other punishment meted out by the judicial system. It had to be approved, it isnt some unsanctioned endeavor.
In this case it also leaves the choice up to the individual.
These people DONT have to do it, they can always just serve their sentences.

Of course, it's a full thought. It's the problem most civilized countries that don't have capital punishment have with capital punishment. The US has often killed the innocent by mistake.

red g jacks Restricted

it's not that the crime is necessarily deserving of death imo

it's more that if they are actual pedos they are sort of an inherent threat... so it's irresponsible to let them free again imo. maybe the age in question should be lowered to a prepubescent age... when you get into that age range the person in question is more or less guaranteed to be ****ed in the head.

so i guess you could just lock them up for life if that suits you better. personally i think killing them is a little less cruel and more straightforward solution but hey what do i know i'm just a crazy guy on the internet