Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
They were the best friends ever 🙁It was a perfect example of e-friendship being stronger than RL friendship. If only Dorksaint didn't post those embarrassing PMs about licking penises with Galan...
Yes. Such PMs exist.
😂 😂 ... I don't have any issues with saint. He's a nice guy (for some strange reason, I think Dark hacked into my acct).
Originally posted by carver9
I'm talking about you though.
It's a dumb argument. Saying Thor holds back more because he talks about it is like someone thinking you're winning a debate because you say you are.
Plus, you honestly are quite the hypocrite to go "you're avoiding the question" with all you've avoided from me. sneer
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderAnd rather kills the shit out of thousands of beings through his history. Yes, Thor kills when you piss him off.
Thor shows more restraint...Thor can permanently kill virtually any opponent by taking his/her soul (bypassing any sort of regeneration or invulnerability in the process), but refuses to do it...
Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Thor shows more restraint...Thor can permanently kill virtually any opponent by taking his/her soul (bypassing any sort of regeneration or invulnerability in the process), but refuses to do it...
Originally posted by HulkIsHulk
The rate depends on fan and fanboy perception
When Thor has several arcs focused on simply such a fact that he has placed subconscious mental blocks so he can never use his full powers, you can talk.
Originally posted by abhilegend
😂When Thor has several arcs focused on simply such a fact that he has placed subconscious mental blocks so he can never use his full powers, you can talk.
I can talk as very very very few characters in comics have a defense against having their soul sucked right out of them...
Thor can utilize this lethal ability simply by willing it as he did against Loki, but chooses not to as its forbidden due to its extreme lethality...
Thor wins...
Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
I can talk as very very very few characters in comics have a defense against having their soul sucked right out of them...Thor can utilize this lethal ability simply by willing it as he did against Loki, but chooses not to as its forbidden due to its extreme lethality...
Thor wins...
It's not about Thor holding back, it's writers not taking that one time ability in consideration.
Learn the difference.
Why should Superman need soul resistance feats? The thread is asking about restraint.
One is a Norse Viking warrior, who's very lust for battle is a key defining trait of him being deemed worthy for his weapon.
The other is the most powerful Herald of his universe, who hides as a mild-mannered reporter.
Originally posted by abhilegend
It failed the only time he tried
False...
It succeeded the 1st time he used it and it destroyed Loki...
Loki was only able to survive it the 2nd time with prep (as the past Loki was brought to the present and saw a vision of Thor striking him down with Soul Suck and was to flee his body seconds before being struck down by Soul Suck the 2nd time around)...
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Why should Superman need soul resistance feats? The thread is asking about restraint.One is a Norse Viking warrior, who's very lust for battle is a key defining trait of him being deemed worthy for his weapon.
The other is the most powerful Herald of his universe, who hides as a mild-mannered reporter.
not for this thread obviously. he needs them so i can beat cbr surfer 😠