Should STAR TREK be Kept Alive?

Started by GordonSkywalker6 pages

The classic series are just that. Classics in every sense of the word. You just can't get any better than watching Kirk and Spock and Bones going through their paces on some alien planet, surrounded by hordes of warlike Klingons.

One of my favorite episodes is were they play gangster forgot the name of it though.

"A Piece of the Action" is the name of that second or third season episode of the original series. A very popular one with me and Scruffy. A great story that puts our heroes right in the middle of a local turf war between gangsters on another planet. Luckily Kirk gets into the swing of things and takes charge towards the episode's climax.

i don't watch star trek that much, but i could care less. to me, it died out of popularity already, eons ago so to speak. sorry to you fans of it.

You misunderstand us friend. We are speaking of how good it was thirty some years ago not now. We feel too many movies and spinoffs have been done and has ruined the whole Star Trek experience.

Yeah these shows that seem old that are actually gold like ST,Dr.Who is good Science fiction is all about.

Star Trek and Dr Who are bona fide classics that have been-for good or bad- brought back many times over the years since each series ended. Sometimes this works and sometimes it flops which is the reason I think Star Trek is long overdue a rest.

Yeah but there always a place in my heart for Dr.Who.

Mine too. I like this better than the current Star Treks.

Diffentaly.

Well it seems everyone here is too young. My generation. We were not raised on STAR TREK. Some of us weren't even born when the first STAR WARS movie came out. Most of my generation was raised on video games and high tech. My mom said that the problem with us is that all the magic is gone. All is high tech now. Maybe she is right judging from the responses. She's a Trekker. For her Trek and the OUTER LIMITS were very intelligent shows. I guess you have to look at it from the standpoint of people who were our age 30 and 40 years ago. I personally have no problem with STAR TREK. My favorite of the 5 shows is TNG. That was the most intelligent and intellectual of the shows.

Well that true my generation don't no it but It saw it and I thought it was pretty cool.I also like stuff now.

We have to remember one thing... that ENTERPRISE was created to capture the flavor of the 1966 show. It is suppose to be the show before Kirk, Spock and McCoy. I feel that is a mistake. The "head" of the 1960s isn't there. The feel isn't there. And of course the major component of all is gone... Gene Roddenberry.

The reason why TNG is far superior to the succeeding Treks is because Roddenberry had full control of it. Full control. He did the show exactly like he wanted to do the classic Trek but couldn't. Studio interference. But Paramount gave Roddenberry total creative control and that is why the show was a smashing success. DS9 was created by Berman and Braga. VOYAGER is also their creation but alot better in some ways than DS9. In some ways DS9 involved alot of religion and conflict around taht religion. VOYAGER was an exploratory ship that got pulled into the Gamma Quadrant of the Galaxy and was trying to get home. That's all. It too was an excellent show and Berman and Braga did their best to stay with the spirit of Roddenberry. A sad ending though. 🙁

All in all, Trek was not a kiddie show. I guess having parents who are very much into Trek helped me see it more clearly.

ST was a head of it's time.

But roddenberry only had any real control over the first series of TNG, considered by fans to be the worst. TNG was good because the conceopt was fresh enough and it was never afraid to experiment with new plots. DS9 half-saved itself by having a proper background plotline but nothing saved Voyager from being just the same thing again.

Enterprise COULD break the mould but it seems to have stopped trying. Mind you, whilst that Borg episode is bad for continuity it was a 100x better than the Voyager ones.

The Borg became the villians of the week after their initial TNG appearances. That is what I think ruined Voyager when they brought them in midway through that series. Seven of Nine was an obvious ploy to get racier subplots so as to attract young male viewers like myself. Ds9 sucked until the Dominion threat and Worf were added into the storylines.

Personally, I felt they should've made a movie about Sulu and the Excelsior after Star Trek VI... Instead of going with the TNG-crew.

It'd have been logical continuation, with them presenting the Excelsior crew at the end of Star Trek VI.

Noooo, instead they killed Kirk. Mleh =P

I agree with you man. A Sulu/Excelsior movie would have been the logical(pun intended) and natural progression from Star Trek VI. Instead we witness the botched up death scene of a legendary starship captain. I think this was the turning point in the Star trek franchise.

True.

None of the films have had the same impact after Generations(Star Trek VII) killed off Captain Kirk. Sorry TNG fans.