Though for me I'd just hold the guides responsible. Who is going to know the area and the boundaries and all that shit better then the guides from that area? As opposed to some dentist from Wisconsin or Minnesota or wherever the hell he is from.
Did he try to specifically lure the lion onto a territory where it was legal to kill it? It's hard to say unless we have video evidence if he purposely did this or if he just had shitty guides or guides who just didn't care.
The guy had some trouble with hunting a bear in the US, so maybe that is being used by people to assume he without a doubt did this on purpose. I don't know, I don't know much about hunting or Africa. What I do know is even though Africa is asking he be sent back to stand trial..THEY are not freaking out half as much as we are in this country. Which is..odd.
But is this a big deal because the lion had a name? Or because it suffered a lot? Since..why is this sad and if he had shot a non-famous lion in a legal area and killed it..nobody would care because f*ck that nameless lion.
So is it just a problem with hunting in general if you do it for reasons other then food..? So what if you do it for food you don't need? If you go deer hunting, don't tell me you couldn't of bought some venison at the store or some other meat, you wouldn't of starved without that deer.
Why aren't people this pissed off over whaling or killing elephants for ivory. Is it because these animals lack names? Or is it specifically people sounding names. So if the lion was named "licorice" or "candycane" would people care? Or is it because we do not have a specific person to lynch up for whaling or poaching?