bad taste? ah gimme a break. he's been dead for a long time, and if he didn't get his fool self paralyzed, he would have been forgotten by now. the only "noble" thing he did was support stem cell research, and that was only when it could have directly affected HIS life. noble my eye.
regardless, routh was just as good, and looks-wise even closer to the mark.
who's the opposite of christopher reeves? christopher walkeN! 💃
Originally posted by manorastroman
bad taste? ah gimme a break. he's been dead for a long time, and if he didn't get his fool self paralyzed, he would have been forgotten by now. the only "noble" thing he did was support stem cell research, and that was only when it could have directly affected HIS life. noble my eye.regardless, routh was just as good, and looks-wise even closer to the mark.
alrighty... to each their own i guess... 😬
for me routh wasn't as good, and as for his looks, i don't agree either...
who's the opposite of christopher reeves? christopher walkeN! 💃
thats not funny. at all.
Chris Reeve is superman, i mean, he was perfect as clark kent and as superman. He adds a lot to the character and when i heard the word superman, i think on chris reeve. Also, i admire him as a person, fighting for his life when he was in a whellchair because his accident with his horse. He was a real superman in real life, brave, true, honest, intelligent, etc. Chris reeve will be always superman in all the aspects.
Originally posted by H. S. 6
Reeves was a decent actor, but I'm with some of the other posters in this thread. He wasn't that good--nothing special. shrug
He was an excellent actor. DId you see another reeves movies beasides superman, like deathtrap, monsignor,the bostonians, anna karenina,street smart, or the remains of the day? Or his work in theatre? He was a very good actor capable of a extense variety of roles beasides superman.
Originally posted by bakerboy
He was an excellent actor. DId you see another reeves movies beasides superman, like deathtrap, monsignor,the bostonians, anna karenina,street smart, or the remains of the day? Or his work in theatre? He was a very good actor capable of a extense variety of roles beasides superman.
Very good point.Yes he WAS that Good.He was an excellent acotr as Bakerboy pointed out so brilliantly in his post.George was good as well but Chris was AMAZING in his role.