San Andreas you say? I got your Cascadia right here, buddy

Started by Robtard1 pages

San Andreas you say? I got your Cascadia right here, buddy

The Really Big One

"Most people in the United States know just one fault line by name: the San Andreas, which runs nearly the length of California and is perpetually rumored to be on the verge of unleashing “the big one.” That rumor is misleading, no matter what the San Andreas ever does. Every fault line has an upper limit to its potency, determined by its length and width, and by how far it can slip. For the San Andreas, one of the most extensively studied and best understood fault lines in the world, that upper limit is roughly an 8.2—a powerful earthquake, but, because the Richter scale is logarithmic, only six per cent as strong as the 2011 event in Japan." -snip

"Just north of the San Andreas, however, lies another fault line. Known as the Cascadia subduction zone, it runs for seven hundred miles off the coast of the Pacific Northwest, beginning near Cape Mendocino, California, continuing along Oregon and Washington, and terminating around Vancouver Island, Canada. The “Cascadia” part of its name comes from the Cascade Range, a chain of volcanic mountains that follow the same course a hundred or so miles inland. The “subduction zone” part refers to a region of the planet where one tectonic plate is sliding underneath (subducting) another. Tectonic plates are those slabs of mantle and crust that, in their epochs-long drift, rearrange the earth’s continents and oceans. Most of the time, their movement is slow, harmless, and all but undetectable. Occasionally, at the borders where they meet, it is not." -snip

"When the next very big earthquake hits, the northwest edge of the continent, from California to Canada and the continental shelf to the Cascades, will drop by as much as six feet and rebound thirty to a hundred feet to the west—losing, within minutes, all the elevation and compression it has gained over centuries. Some of that shift will take place beneath the ocean, displacing a colossal quantity of seawater. (Watch what your fingertips do when you flatten your hand.) The water will surge upward into a huge hill, then promptly collapse. One side will rush west, toward Japan. The other side will rush east, in a seven-hundred-mile liquid wall that will reach the Northwest coast, on average, fifteen minutes after the earthquake begins. By the time the shaking has ceased and the tsunami has receded, the region will be unrecognizable. Kenneth Murphy, who directs FEMA’s Region X, the division responsible for Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Alaska, says, “Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast.” -snip

"In the Pacific Northwest, the area of impact will cover* some hundred and forty thousand square miles, including Seattle, Tacoma, Portland, Eugene, Salem (the capital city of Oregon), Olympia (the capital of Washington), and some seven million people. When the next full-margin rupture happens, that region will suffer the worst natural disaster in the history of North America. Roughly three thousand people died in San Francisco’s 1906 earthquake. Almost two thousand died in Hurricane Katrina. Almost three hundred died in Hurricane Sandy. FEMA projects that nearly thirteen thousand people will die in the Cascadia earthquake and tsunami. Another twenty-seven thousand will be injured, and the agency expects that it will need to provide shelter for a million displaced people, and food and water for another two and a half million. “This is one time that I’m hoping all the science is wrong, and it won’t happen for another thousand years,” Murphy says." -snip

Full Story:http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/07/20/the-really-big-one

If you don't want to read the article, it's basically about a long overdue natural disaster that will devastate a large portion of the US' West Coast.

So, in the TL;DR...what's the upper limit for the Cascadia zone?

Between 8.7 and 9.2, plus a tsunami upwards of 100 feet high

Damn, that is messed up. When it comes to natural disasters the most we have to worry about here is some flooding in the basement. Though at my cottage in Indiana we did have to worry about a tornado or two.

Originally posted by Robtard
Between 8.7 and 9.2, plus a tsunami upwards of 100 feet high

That... that is gonna suck a lot of dick when it happens.

Kinda diggin' how an earthquake that essentially starts in California is going to **** up everything not-California in the vicinity with a giant wave.

I mean, the Earthquake will screw us pretty hard, but the Earthquake on top of the hoog-phuck tsunami is like a double-kick in the ass.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Kinda diggin' how an earthquake that essentially starts in California is going to **** up everything not-California in the vicinity with a giant wave.

I mean, the Earthquake will screw us pretty hard, but the Earthquake on top of the hoog-phuck tsunami is like a double-kick in the ass.

If I were religious I'd almost think God hates the west coast. But I'm not religious..thumbs up for for random chance 👆

Wonder if all that disasterness will have any effect on the Yellowstone Caldera. What say thee, Roland Emmerich?

Originally posted by Mindship
Wonder if all that disasterness will have any effect on the Yellowstone Caldera. What say thee, Roland Emmerich?

That would be a terrifying combo, if the caldera blew after that quake. Yikes.

Heard about this recently through - of all people - author Neil Gaiman's twitter account. But yeah, it's a real thing. And a fascinating article. Well worth a full read, for those interested.