Originally posted by atv2
Is it me or did anyone else find that most of the heroes in the DC Universe have a misfortune of not being able to maintain a good relationship/marriage with anyone?
It's not just you. One of the DC execs- Didio, I think- even made a post right after the Batwoman marriage cancel about how heroes need to 'sacrifice' their happiness in personal lives and that's part of what makes them heroic.
Which is not a philosophy I hold in the slightest.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Welcome to comics in general.
I'd like to point out a book called "Fred Perry's Gold Digger."
Characters are allowed to have relationships that work, long term. Multiple characters get married. A kid happens and it doesn't stop the action! (Though, granted, there's a timeskip at one point).
The status quo is all that matters. Why I don't read them anymore.
Eeeeh, I quite disagree.
Rather, I will say, some specific bits override all. Major characters will never become unusable. The setting won't become unusable or too weird permanently.
However, teams make break up and never reunite in anything resembling the same makeup. Events happen which permanently alter two character's relationships in ways that are still in effect decades later, or they may evolve and shift. The socialpolitical situation may change. New heroes may arise and take major roles.
Take a look at Marvel. Compare, say, a few months before Civil War, to 4 years before that, to 6 years before that. Each jump is drastically different, and the start and end point are too. In that time, Avengers went from a single team, to two opposed team, to a friendly franchise. The X-men have changed even more drastically- Cyclops especially massively changed, and the 'mutants rearising period' is very different than the pre-M-day period, with the post-decimation period odder stuff.
Personally, my feeling is, once things haven't been remotely similar for a decade, you can stop saying the status quo is god.